Religious and Spiritual Coping Mechanisms

Religious and spiritual coping mechanisms are vital strategies individuals use to manage stress, trauma, and existential challenges, often intertwined with personal beliefs and cultural frameworks. This article explores the theoretical foundations of religious and spiritual coping, differentiating between positive and negative forms and their psychological impact. Drawing on empirical research, it examines religious practices such as prayer and community support alongside spiritual practices like mindfulness and meditation, highlighting their roles in fostering resilience and mental well-being. The integration of these mechanisms in psychotherapeutic settings is also discussed, emphasizing ethical considerations and potential challenges. Through this exploration, the article underscores the importance of religious and spiritual coping in enhancing psychological health and provides future directions for research and therapeutic applications.

Introduction

Coping mechanisms are psychological strategies that individuals employ to manage stress, emotions, and adversity (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). These strategies can range from problem-solving and seeking social support to more internally focused methods like emotional regulation. Among the various coping methods, religious and spiritual coping has gained considerable attention in psychological research due to its profound impact on emotional well-being, especially during periods of significant life stress (Pargament, 1997). Religious and spiritual coping are distinct yet overlapping categories, where religious coping involves structured, institutional beliefs and practices, while spiritual coping often pertains to more personal and non-institutional approaches to finding meaning and solace (Koenig, 2012).

Religious and spiritual coping mechanisms hold particular significance in the context of transpersonal psychology, a branch of psychology that focuses on the spiritual aspects of the human experience. Transpersonal psychology extends beyond conventional frameworks to explore how individuals transcend the ego and connect with a larger sense of meaning or spirituality (Hartelius, Caplan, & Rardin, 2007). In this realm, religious and spiritual coping mechanisms are viewed as pathways that facilitate personal transformation, offering individuals tools to navigate psychological distress by fostering connection to a higher power or a deeper sense of self. These mechanisms have been shown to contribute to resilience and post-traumatic growth, especially in coping with events such as illness, grief, and existential crises (Ai et al., 2007).

This article aims to explore religious and spiritual coping mechanisms, their theoretical foundations, and their application in both individual and therapeutic contexts. It will examine positive and negative forms of religious coping, the impact of spiritual practices on mental health, and the integration of these coping strategies into psychotherapeutic practice. By drawing on empirical research and case studies, the article will offer a comprehensive overview of how religious and spiritual coping can enhance psychological resilience and promote healing in diverse cultural and religious contexts. This exploration will highlight the importance of recognizing these mechanisms as valuable resources in mental health care, while also addressing the challenges of integrating them into contemporary therapeutic approaches.

Theoretical Foundations of Religious and Spiritual Coping

Psychological Models of Coping

Religious and spiritual coping mechanisms are deeply rooted in psychological theories of stress and coping, most notably Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) transactional model of stress. This model suggests that coping is a process where individuals evaluate a stressful event and subsequently deploy various strategies to manage emotional or physical responses. Religious and spiritual coping fall under the broad category of emotion-focused coping, wherein individuals attempt to alleviate emotional distress by reinterpreting events through a religious or spiritual lens (Pargament, 1997). These strategies provide a framework for finding meaning in adverse situations, such as viewing suffering as a spiritual test or divine will. This cognitive reframing can reduce emotional distress and promote acceptance of circumstances that are beyond personal control (Ai et al., 2007).

In addition to the transactional model, Kenneth Pargament’s (1997) work has been instrumental in shaping the understanding of religious coping. Pargament introduced a comprehensive model that includes both positive and negative religious coping strategies. Positive religious coping, often linked with greater psychological well-being, includes practices such as seeking spiritual support, finding comfort in religious beliefs, and using religious practices to create a sense of meaning (Pargament, 1997). Conversely, negative religious coping, which can exacerbate stress, involves feelings of spiritual discontent, viewing adversity as divine punishment, or questioning one’s faith. This duality within religious coping mechanisms underscores the complexity of how religion influences psychological processes, depending on how individuals interpret and engage with their beliefs during crises (Koenig, 2012).

The broader psychological framework of coping also includes existential and meaning-based theories, which align with the spiritual aspect of coping. Viktor Frankl’s (1963) logotherapy emphasizes the human search for meaning, particularly in the face of suffering. Spiritual coping strategies often resonate with this idea, as individuals turn to spiritual practices to find purpose and meaning in life’s challenges (Smith et al., 2003). These theoretical foundations suggest that both religious and spiritual coping can serve as powerful tools for emotional regulation and resilience, but their effectiveness largely depends on the individual’s personal and cultural context, as well as the specific coping strategies they employ.

Positive and Negative Religious Coping

Positive religious coping is characterized by a constructive use of faith and religious practices to deal with life stressors. Individuals employing positive religious coping often turn to prayer, meditation, religious rituals, and engagement with their religious community for support (Koenig, 2012). These practices provide psychological benefits such as emotional comfort, a sense of purpose, and an overarching framework for understanding suffering. For instance, many individuals find solace in the belief that a higher power is guiding them through difficult times or that their suffering serves a greater purpose (Pargament, 1997). Empirical studies consistently show that positive religious coping is associated with better mental health outcomes, including lower levels of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms, particularly among individuals facing chronic illness or life-threatening situations (Ano & Vasconcelles, 2005).

Negative religious coping, on the other hand, involves religious beliefs and practices that may hinder psychological well-being. This type of coping includes feelings of spiritual abandonment, viewing suffering as punishment from a higher power, or engaging in self-blame for adverse events (Pargament et al., 1998). Negative religious coping is often linked to poorer mental health outcomes, including higher levels of depression, anxiety, and existential despair (Koenig, 2012). For example, individuals who believe they are being punished by a higher power may experience exacerbated feelings of guilt and worthlessness, making it harder for them to cope with life’s challenges. Research suggests that negative religious coping is more prevalent in individuals who are struggling with their faith or who lack a supportive religious community (Smith et al., 2003).

The dual nature of religious coping underscores the importance of how religious beliefs are applied during times of stress. While positive religious coping fosters resilience, negative religious coping can exacerbate psychological distress. Therapists and psychologists working with religious individuals must therefore be sensitive to these dynamics, recognizing that religion can both support and undermine emotional well-being depending on how it is utilized (Pargament, 1997). Understanding the difference between these forms of religious coping is essential for providing effective therapeutic interventions that respect the client’s belief system while promoting healthy coping strategies.

Spiritual Coping and Meaning-Making

Spiritual coping extends beyond the confines of organized religion, often involving personal and individualized practices aimed at finding meaning and transcendence during difficult times (Gall et al., 2005). Unlike religious coping, which typically involves a structured set of beliefs and rituals, spiritual coping can encompass a broader range of practices such as mindfulness, meditation, and nature-based spirituality. These practices often focus on self-reflection, inner peace, and the search for personal meaning rather than adhering to traditional religious frameworks. Spiritual coping mechanisms are particularly common among individuals who identify as spiritual but not religious, a demographic that has been growing in recent years (Pew Research Center, 2015).

The central role of meaning-making in spiritual coping aligns with existential psychology, which emphasizes the human drive to find purpose and meaning in life’s challenges. Viktor Frankl’s (1963) logotherapy highlights the psychological importance of finding meaning in suffering, a concept that resonates deeply with spiritual coping practices. Individuals engaged in spiritual coping often frame their struggles as opportunities for personal growth, self-transcendence, or connection to a greater whole (Park, 2005). Research has shown that spiritual coping can lead to post-traumatic growth, where individuals emerge from adversity with a strengthened sense of purpose and identity (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). This process of meaning-making is central to the healing and transformative potential of spiritual coping.

However, spiritual coping is not without its challenges. Some individuals may experience what is known as “spiritual bypassing,” where spiritual practices are used to avoid dealing with difficult emotions or psychological conflicts (Masters, 2010). For instance, an individual may engage in meditation or mindfulness as a way to suppress grief or anxiety rather than confronting these emotions directly. While spiritual practices can foster emotional resilience, it is important for individuals and therapists to ensure that these practices are used in a healthy and constructive manner. In therapeutic settings, spiritual coping mechanisms can be powerful tools for healing when they are integrated thoughtfully and in conjunction with other psychological interventions.

Religious Coping Mechanisms

Definition and Examples of Religious Coping Strategies

Religious coping strategies are behaviors and practices grounded in a person’s religious beliefs and traditions, which they use to manage stress, grief, or life challenges (Pargament, 1997). These strategies can take various forms, such as prayer, attending religious services, performing religious rituals, reading sacred texts, and seeking guidance from religious leaders. Prayer is one of the most commonly studied forms of religious coping and can be both individual and communal. Through prayer, individuals often seek comfort, express gratitude, or ask for strength and guidance (Ai et al., 2007). Other examples of religious coping include engaging in rituals, such as lighting candles, fasting, or participating in ceremonies like baptisms or funerals, which can help individuals connect to their faith and community during stressful times (Koenig, 2012).

These religious coping mechanisms provide a sense of structure and meaning during chaotic life events. For example, during the grieving process, religious rituals like funerals or memorial services serve not only as a way to honor the deceased but also offer communal support and collective coping through shared religious practices (Pargament et al., 1998). Additionally, religious teachings often provide a framework for understanding suffering, offering explanations that align with one’s faith, such as viewing adversity as a test from a higher power or an opportunity for spiritual growth (Ano & Vasconcelles, 2005). Thus, religious coping can provide a cognitive framework that helps individuals reframe negative experiences in a way that fosters resilience and emotional healing.

Research supports the effectiveness of religious coping strategies in managing a variety of life stressors, including chronic illness, grief, and trauma. Studies show that individuals who engage in religious coping often report lower levels of anxiety and depression, higher levels of life satisfaction, and greater psychological resilience (Koenig, 2012). This positive impact is particularly pronounced in individuals dealing with severe or chronic stress, where religious practices provide not only emotional support but also a sense of hope and meaning in otherwise difficult circumstances (Smith et al., 2003). As a result, religious coping has been widely recognized as an important factor in promoting emotional and psychological well-being.

The Role of Religious Community and Social Support in Coping

The religious community often plays a crucial role in the coping process by providing emotional, social, and spiritual support. Faith communities, such as churches, mosques, temples, and synagogues, can offer a strong network of support that helps individuals manage stress and adversity. This communal support is particularly important during significant life events, such as illness or bereavement, where individuals might struggle with feelings of isolation and despair (Krause, 2010). In such cases, religious communities provide a safe space for individuals to express their emotions, receive guidance from religious leaders, and engage in collective religious practices that offer comfort and solidarity (Koenig, 2012).

Religious social support can take many forms, including formal practices like group prayer sessions, religious counseling, and organized social activities, as well as informal support such as emotional care from fellow congregants. For example, in many Christian communities, group prayers are held for those facing illness or personal crises, creating a sense of shared spiritual support and collective hope (Koenig, 2012). Additionally, religious community leaders often provide guidance and counseling that helps individuals navigate existential questions and spiritual dilemmas that arise in times of hardship (Smith et al., 2003). This form of support is particularly helpful because it combines emotional, social, and spiritual dimensions, making it a more holistic form of coping compared to purely psychological strategies.

Empirical research highlights the significant role that religious social support plays in buffering the negative effects of stress. Studies have shown that individuals who receive strong social support from their religious communities report better mental health outcomes and exhibit greater resilience in the face of stress (Krause, 2010). For instance, research has demonstrated that religious social support is associated with lower levels of depression, higher levels of life satisfaction, and greater feelings of purpose and belonging (Koenig, 2012). This indicates that the social dimension of religious coping is not only a source of comfort but also an important protective factor in mental health, fostering a sense of connection and shared purpose among individuals during challenging times.

Cultural and Religious Contexts of Coping

Religious coping mechanisms vary significantly across different cultural and religious contexts, reflecting the diverse ways in which individuals use faith to manage stress. In Christianity, for example, prayer and belief in divine providence are central to the coping process, while in Islam, practices such as daily prayers (Salah) and fasting during Ramadan are significant spiritual exercises that provide emotional resilience and communal solidarity (Abu-Raiya et al., 2008). Hinduism emphasizes karma and dharma, where individuals view life events, including suffering, as part of a cosmic cycle of moral responsibility and duty. In such cases, religious coping might involve rituals, offerings, or participation in festivals that reinforce spiritual beliefs and provide a sense of control over one’s destiny (Pargament, 1997).

Cultural factors also shape how religious coping mechanisms are perceived and practiced. For instance, collectivist cultures often emphasize community-based coping, where religious practices are shared among family and community members (Kim & Sherman, 2007). This contrasts with individualist cultures, where religious coping might focus more on personal spiritual practices and individual prayer. In some cultures, religious leaders play a prominent role in guiding coping practices, while in others, lay individuals or community elders might serve as the primary sources of spiritual and emotional support (Abu-Raiya et al., 2008). These cultural nuances underscore the importance of understanding religious coping within its specific sociocultural and religious context.

Moreover, different religious traditions offer unique theological interpretations of suffering and adversity, which shape how individuals engage in religious coping. For example, in Buddhism, suffering is understood as an inherent part of life, and coping strategies may involve meditation and mindfulness practices that focus on detachment and acceptance of suffering (Gall et al., 2005). In contrast, religious traditions that emphasize a personal relationship with a higher power, such as Christianity and Islam, may focus on prayer and divine intervention as central to the coping process (Pargament, 1997). Understanding these diverse cultural and religious contexts is essential for providing culturally competent care and support to individuals using religious coping strategies.

Spiritual Coping Mechanisms

Definition and Practices of Spiritual Coping

Spiritual coping mechanisms refer to individualized, often non-institutionalized practices that people use to manage stress and find meaning in difficult circumstances. Unlike religious coping, which is tied to organized belief systems, spiritual coping focuses more on personal spirituality and the quest for connection to the transcendent, whether or not this includes a belief in a higher power (Pargament, 1997). Common spiritual coping strategies include mindfulness practices, meditation, nature-based spirituality, yoga, and contemplative prayer. These practices encourage self-reflection and awareness, helping individuals to process emotions, confront existential challenges, and foster a deeper sense of purpose (Gall et al., 2005). Spiritual coping is particularly prevalent among individuals who identify as “spiritual but not religious,” a growing demographic that engages in personal spiritual practices rather than adhering to structured religious doctrines (Pew Research Center, 2015).

Spiritual coping mechanisms provide a flexible framework for dealing with stress and adversity. For example, mindfulness and meditation practices are widely recognized for their role in reducing anxiety and promoting emotional regulation (Feldman et al., 2007). These practices help individuals cultivate a non-judgmental awareness of their thoughts and feelings, allowing them to engage with stressors from a place of inner calm. Similarly, nature-based spirituality, which involves spending time in natural environments to foster a sense of connection and peace, has been shown to reduce symptoms of depression and increase psychological well-being (Bratman et al., 2012). Through these practices, spiritual coping can help individuals transcend the immediate distress of a situation and find solace in a broader sense of meaning and interconnectedness.

Spiritual Coping and Personal Transformation

A key aspect of spiritual coping is its role in personal transformation, often leading individuals toward greater self-awareness, resilience, and meaning-making during times of crisis. Spiritual coping allows individuals to frame their challenges as opportunities for growth, fostering what is known as post-traumatic growth, where individuals report positive psychological change as a result of their struggles (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). For instance, someone experiencing a significant life stressor, such as the loss of a loved one, might turn to spiritual practices like meditation or journaling to process their grief and develop a deeper sense of purpose. These practices not only help in managing immediate emotional pain but also facilitate long-term personal growth by allowing individuals to integrate the experience into their evolving life narrative (Park, 2005).

Empirical studies have shown that individuals engaged in spiritual coping often experience higher levels of psychological resilience and well-being, particularly when they are able to make meaning out of their suffering (Smith et al., 2003). Research indicates that spiritual coping is linked to improved mental health outcomes, such as reduced anxiety, depression, and increased life satisfaction, especially in populations dealing with chronic illness, bereavement, or existential crises (Gall et al., 2005). By facilitating a shift in perspective, spiritual coping can help individuals not only endure hardship but also emerge from it with a renewed sense of purpose and connection to something larger than themselves. This transformative process is central to the healing potential of spiritual coping, making it a powerful tool for managing life’s most profound challenges.

Integrating Religious and Spiritual Coping in Psychotherapy

Incorporating Religious and Spiritual Coping in Therapy

The integration of religious and spiritual coping mechanisms into psychotherapy has gained increasing recognition as a valuable approach for addressing the holistic needs of clients. Many individuals naturally turn to their religious or spiritual beliefs during times of distress, making it essential for therapists to acknowledge and incorporate these dimensions into treatment (Pargament, 2007). Therapists who are open to discussing religious and spiritual concerns can create a supportive environment where clients feel comfortable exploring their beliefs as part of the healing process. This approach is particularly relevant in transpersonal psychology, where the emphasis is on transcending the ego and fostering connection to a greater sense of meaning and purpose (Hartelius et al., 2007). Techniques such as guided imagery, meditation, and spiritual journaling can be used to support clients in harnessing their spiritual resources for coping with stress, trauma, and existential concerns.

Therapists must, however, be mindful of individual differences in religious and spiritual beliefs. Cultural competence is crucial when integrating these coping mechanisms into therapy, as different religious traditions and spiritual practices may resonate more with some clients than others (Vieten et al., 2013). For example, prayer and scripture reading may be highly effective coping strategies for a Christian client but may not hold the same significance for someone from a different faith or for a client who identifies as spiritual but not religious. By being culturally attuned and respectful of diverse belief systems, therapists can tailor interventions to align with the client’s spiritual worldview, ensuring that religious or spiritual coping strategies are personalized and relevant to their unique experiences (Wortmann & Park, 2009).

Ethical Considerations and Challenges

Integrating religious and spiritual coping in psychotherapy also raises important ethical considerations. Therapists must be careful not to impose their own religious or spiritual beliefs onto the client, as doing so can lead to boundary violations and harm the therapeutic relationship (Barnett & Johnson, 2011). The American Psychological Association’s (APA) code of ethics highlights the importance of respecting client autonomy and avoiding any form of coercion in therapy. To address these concerns, therapists should adopt a client-centered approach, where the exploration of religious and spiritual issues is guided by the client’s preferences and needs. Open-ended questions that invite the client to reflect on how their religious or spiritual beliefs influence their coping can facilitate this process without imposing specific perspectives (Pargament, 2007).

Another challenge in integrating religious and spiritual coping mechanisms into therapy is the potential for “spiritual bypassing,” a phenomenon where clients use spirituality to avoid confronting difficult emotions or psychological issues (Masters, 2010). For example, a client might engage in excessive meditation or prayer to suppress feelings of anger or sadness rather than working through these emotions in a constructive way. Therapists must be aware of this dynamic and help clients recognize when their spiritual practices are contributing to emotional avoidance rather than fostering healing. By encouraging clients to engage with their emotions while also drawing on their spiritual resources, therapists can promote a more balanced and integrative approach to coping (Vieten et al., 2013).

Case Studies and Empirical Support

The effectiveness of integrating religious and spiritual coping into psychotherapy has been supported by empirical research. Studies have shown that clients who are able to engage their religious and spiritual beliefs in therapy often report better mental health outcomes, including reductions in anxiety, depression, and stress (Ano & Vasconcelles, 2005). For example, a study by Pearce et al. (2015) found that clients who participated in spiritually integrated cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) experienced greater reductions in depressive symptoms compared to those who received standard CBT. This suggests that incorporating religious and spiritual coping strategies can enhance the therapeutic process, especially for clients who see their faith as an essential part of their identity and coping framework.

Case studies also provide valuable insights into the therapeutic use of religious and spiritual coping mechanisms. One such case involved a client struggling with existential anxiety following the death of a loved one. By incorporating spiritual journaling and guided meditation focused on connecting with a sense of the divine, the therapist helped the client process grief and find meaning in the experience, leading to significant emotional healing (Richards & Bergin, 2005). These examples underscore the potential for religious and spiritual coping to facilitate not only psychological resilience but also personal transformation. As research in this area continues to grow, the integration of these coping strategies is becoming an increasingly accepted and effective component of holistic mental health care.

Conclusion

Religious and spiritual coping mechanisms are essential components of many individuals’ responses to stress, trauma, and existential challenges. As highlighted in this article, these coping strategies provide individuals with a framework for understanding adversity and finding meaning during difficult times. Religious coping, which is often structured within institutionalized belief systems, offers individuals a sense of comfort, connection, and purpose through practices such as prayer, rituals, and community support (Pargament, 1997). Spiritual coping, on the other hand, emphasizes personal, non-institutionalized practices like mindfulness and meditation, allowing individuals to engage in self-reflection and foster emotional resilience (Gall et al., 2005). Both forms of coping can provide significant psychological benefits, including reductions in anxiety, depression, and stress (Ano & Vasconcelles, 2005).

However, the effectiveness of religious and spiritual coping depends on how these mechanisms are employed. Positive religious coping, which involves finding support in one’s faith and seeing adversity as an opportunity for growth, is linked with better psychological outcomes (Pargament et al., 1998). In contrast, negative religious coping, such as feelings of spiritual abandonment or viewing hardship as divine punishment, can exacerbate psychological distress (Koenig, 2012). Similarly, while spiritual coping offers a flexible and personal approach to managing stress, there is a risk of spiritual bypassing, where individuals may avoid dealing with painful emotions by relying too heavily on spiritual practices (Masters, 2010). Therapists working with clients who use religious and spiritual coping must be sensitive to these dynamics and provide culturally competent care that respects the client’s beliefs while promoting healthy coping strategies (Vieten et al., 2013).

The integration of religious and spiritual coping mechanisms into psychotherapy offers a powerful way to enhance mental health care, especially for clients who view their faith or spirituality as central to their coping process. Empirical research has shown that incorporating these coping strategies in therapy can lead to improved outcomes, including increased resilience and psychological well-being (Pearce et al., 2015). By fostering an open and inclusive therapeutic environment, therapists can help clients harness their religious and spiritual resources in ways that promote healing and personal transformation. As research on religious and spiritual coping continues to evolve, it is crucial for mental health professionals to remain attuned to the complex interplay between faith, spirituality, and psychological well-being, ensuring that these practices are used constructively in both individual and therapeutic contexts.

Bibliography

Abu-Raiya, H., Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2008). Examining coping methods with stress and burnout in a multi-religious sample in Israel. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 11(4), 341–357.
Ai, A. L., Tice, T. N., Peterson, C., & Huang, B. (2007). Prayers, spiritual support, and positive attitudes in coping with the September 11 national crisis. Journal of Personality, 75(2), 255–286.
Ano, G. G., & Vasconcelles, E. B. (2005). Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 461–480.
Barnett, J. E., & Johnson, W. B. (2011). Integrating spirituality and religion into psychotherapy: Persistent dilemmas, ethical issues, and a proposed decision-making process. Ethics & Behavior, 21(2), 147–164.
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), 8567–8572.
Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190.
Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. Beacon Press.
Gall, T. L., Charbonneau, C., Clarke, N. H., Grant, K., Joseph, A., & Shouldice, L. (2005). Understanding the nature and role of spirituality in relation to coping and health: A conceptual framework. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 46(2), 88–104.
Hartelius, G., Caplan, M., & Rardin, M. A. (2007). Transpersonal psychology: Defining the past, divining the future. The Humanistic Psychologist, 35(2), 135–160.
Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2007). “Express yourself”: Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 1–11.
Koenig, H. G. (2012). The handbook of religion and health. Oxford University Press.
Krause, N. (2010). Religious involvement, gratitude, and change in depressive symptoms over time. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20(4), 244–255.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
Masters, R. A. (2010). Spiritual bypassing: When spirituality disconnects us from what really matters. North Atlantic Books.
Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press.
Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. Guilford Press.
Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (1998). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543.
Park, C. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 707–729.
Pearce, M. J., Koenig, H. G., Robins, C. J., Daher, N., Nelson, B., Shaw, S. F., … & King, M. B. (2015). Religiously integrated cognitive behavioral therapy: A new method of treatment for major depression in patients with chronic medical illness. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(1), 34–43.
Pew Research Center. (2015). U.S. public becoming less religious. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org.
Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (2005). A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. American Psychological Association.
Smith, T. B., McCullough, M. E., & Poll, J. (2003). Religiousness and depression: Evidence for a main effect and the moderating influence of stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 614–636.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.
Vieten, C., Scammell, S., Pilato, R., Ammondson, I., Pargament, K. I., & Lukoff, D. (2013). Spiritual and religious competencies for psychologists. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(3), 129–144.
Wortmann, J. H., & Park, C. L. (2009). Religion and spirituality in adjustment following bereavement: An integrative review. Death Studies, 33(8), 707–736.