Transpersonal Psychology

iResearchNet

Home » The Role of Subjectivity in Transpersonal Research

The Role of Subjectivity in Transpersonal Research

This article explores the pivotal role of subjectivity in transpersonal research, emphasizing its significance in understanding the complexities of human experience beyond traditional psychological frameworks. By examining various methodological approaches, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods, the article highlights how subjectivity influences data interpretation, participant narratives, and ethical considerations in research practices. Through an analysis of significant case studies, the discussion illustrates the profound impact of subjective experiences on theoretical frameworks and therapeutic applications within transpersonal psychology. Ultimately, this article advocates for a nuanced appreciation of subjectivity, suggesting that recognizing and integrating individual perspectives can enhance the depth and relevance of transpersonal research, paving the way for future explorations in the field.

Introduction

Transpersonal psychology, a branch of psychology that integrates spiritual and transcendent aspects of the human experience, has gained recognition for its unique approach to understanding consciousness and personal growth (Walsh & Vaughan, 1993). This discipline emphasizes the exploration of experiences that transcend the ordinary self, aiming to understand phenomena such as peak experiences, altered states of consciousness, and spiritual awakenings (Braud & Anderson, 1998). While traditional psychological paradigms often prioritize objective measurements and empirical data, transpersonal research inherently acknowledges the importance of subjective experiences in shaping individual realities. Thus, the study of subjectivity becomes crucial in expanding the boundaries of psychological inquiry and fostering a holistic understanding of the human psyche.

The significance of subjectivity in transpersonal research can be viewed through the lens of phenomenology, which emphasizes the study of lived experiences from the first-person perspective (Heidegger, 1962). This approach allows researchers to delve into the rich tapestry of human consciousness, recognizing that each individual’s experiences and interpretations are shaped by unique personal, cultural, and spiritual contexts (Moustakas, 1994). In transpersonal psychology, subjectivity not only serves as a lens through which researchers can gain insights into the complexities of human experiences but also highlights the role of the researcher as an active participant in the research process (Finlay, 2008). As such, understanding the dynamics of subjectivity is essential for conducting meaningful transpersonal research that resonates with the multifaceted nature of human experience.

The purpose of this article is to explore the role of subjectivity in transpersonal research, providing a comprehensive examination of its implications for methodology, interpretation, and the overall understanding of human consciousness. By investigating the interplay between subjective experiences and transpersonal phenomena, this article aims to illuminate how these insights can enhance both theoretical frameworks and practical applications in the field. Ultimately, acknowledging and embracing subjectivity in transpersonal research can lead to richer, more nuanced understandings of the transformative aspects of human experience, fostering a greater appreciation for the diverse pathways of personal and spiritual growth.

Understanding Subjectivity

Subjectivity, a central concept in psychology, refers to the ways in which individuals experience, interpret, and give meaning to their thoughts, emotions, and actions. It encompasses personal perceptions, beliefs, and feelings that shape an individual’s understanding of the world (Burr, 2015). In the context of transpersonal psychology, subjectivity is particularly significant as it highlights the diversity of human experiences, especially those that transcend ordinary consciousness. This understanding is essential for researchers and practitioners alike, as it emphasizes that individuals’ experiences of spirituality, mysticism, and personal transformation are deeply influenced by their unique backgrounds and contexts (Gergen, 2009).

The exploration of subjectivity in transpersonal research is rooted in phenomenological approaches, which prioritize understanding individuals’ lived experiences through qualitative methods (Finlay, 2009). Phenomenology asserts that reality is constructed through individual experiences, and thus, the subjective accounts of participants are not mere data points but rich narratives that reveal insights into their inner worlds. This focus on subjective experience allows researchers to engage deeply with participants’ meanings, recognizing that their insights into transpersonal phenomena—such as spiritual awakenings or mystical experiences—are shaped by their personal histories, cultural contexts, and social environments (Moustakas, 1994). Such an approach contrasts with traditional methodologies that often seek to minimize subjectivity in favor of objective measures, thereby risking the loss of vital contextual information.

Furthermore, understanding subjectivity requires acknowledging the reflexivity of researchers themselves. In transpersonal research, the researcher’s own beliefs, experiences, and biases can influence the research process and outcomes (Finlay, 2002). Reflexivity involves a critical self-examination of how the researcher’s subjectivity shapes their interpretations and interactions with participants, which is particularly crucial when exploring sensitive and deeply personal topics related to spirituality and consciousness. By embracing reflexivity, researchers can create a more transparent and authentic research environment that honors the subjective experiences of participants, ultimately enriching the quality and depth of transpersonal research (Schwartz, 2010). This nuanced understanding of subjectivity is fundamental in fostering a comprehensive and empathetic approach to studying transpersonal phenomena.

Methodological Approaches in Transpersonal Research

Qualitative Methods

Qualitative methods are particularly well-suited for transpersonal research, as they allow for an in-depth exploration of individuals’ subjective experiences and interpretations of phenomena such as spirituality and altered states of consciousness. Techniques such as interviews, focus groups, and open-ended questionnaires provide rich, narrative data that reflect the complexities of human experience (Denzin & Lincoln, 2011). For instance, semi-structured interviews enable participants to articulate their feelings and insights regarding transpersonal experiences in their own words, thereby revealing the nuances of their lived realities. This approach aligns with the phenomenological emphasis on understanding the essence of experiences from the first-person perspective, making qualitative methods essential for capturing the depth of transpersonal phenomena (Van Manen, 2014).

Additionally, qualitative methods facilitate a more flexible and adaptive research design, which is beneficial when exploring the multifaceted nature of transpersonal experiences. Researchers can modify their questions and probes based on participants’ responses, allowing for a more organic flow of conversation that can uncover deeper insights (Biggerstaff & Thompson, 2008). Moreover, qualitative data analysis techniques, such as thematic analysis and grounded theory, enable researchers to identify patterns and themes within the data that may illuminate new dimensions of transpersonal experiences (Braun & Clarke, 2006). By prioritizing the subjective voices of participants, qualitative methods contribute significantly to the body of knowledge in transpersonal psychology, enhancing the understanding of how individuals navigate and interpret their spiritual journeys.

Quantitative Methods

While qualitative methods are fundamental in transpersonal research, quantitative methods also play a vital role in examining transpersonal phenomena through statistical analyses and objective measurements. These methods allow researchers to quantify experiences and identify correlations between various variables, such as spirituality, well-being, and psychological health (MacDonald & Holland, 2002). For instance, standardized questionnaires and psychometric scales can assess aspects of spiritual experiences, including mystical experiences or measures of self-transcendence, providing a means to compare findings across diverse populations (Zinnbauer et al., 1997). By employing quantitative approaches, researchers can generate empirical evidence that supports theoretical claims within transpersonal psychology.

However, the integration of quantitative methods in transpersonal research is not without challenges. One significant limitation is the difficulty in capturing the richness of subjective experiences through numerical data, which can lead to oversimplification of complex phenomena (Snyder et al., 2006). Additionally, the reliance on self-report measures may introduce biases, as participants might underreport or misrepresent their experiences due to social desirability or lack of awareness (Kenny, 2011). Despite these challenges, quantitative methods can complement qualitative approaches, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of transpersonal experiences by providing a broader context and revealing potential patterns and trends within the data. By combining both methodologies, researchers can harness the strengths of each approach to enrich transpersonal research.

Mixed-Methods Approaches

Mixed-methods approaches, which integrate qualitative and quantitative methodologies, have emerged as an effective strategy in transpersonal research, offering a more comprehensive view of complex phenomena. This methodology allows researchers to leverage the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative approaches, providing a multifaceted understanding of participants’ experiences (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017). For example, a mixed-methods study might involve collecting quantitative data through a standardized spiritual well-being scale, followed by qualitative interviews to explore participants’ personal narratives and contextualize their quantitative scores. This combination not only enhances the richness of the data but also allows for triangulation, where findings from one method can validate and inform findings from the other (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010).

Moreover, the use of mixed-methods approaches can address some of the limitations inherent in purely qualitative or quantitative studies. For instance, while qualitative methods provide depth, they often lack generalizability; conversely, quantitative methods may miss the subjective nuances of individual experiences. By integrating both, researchers can generate a more holistic understanding of transpersonal experiences that respects individual subjectivity while also providing empirical data to support broader trends (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004). This methodological pluralism is particularly important in transpersonal research, where the interplay of subjective experiences and measurable variables can illuminate the complex nature of human consciousness and personal transformation.

The Impact of Subjectivity on Research Outcomes

Interpretation of Findings

The interpretation of findings in transpersonal research is profoundly influenced by the subjective experiences of both participants and researchers. Subjectivity shapes the lens through which data is analyzed, leading to varied interpretations based on individual perspectives, biases, and theoretical frameworks (Mays & Pope, 2000). For instance, in qualitative studies, researchers’ backgrounds, beliefs, and values can impact how they interpret participants’ narratives, potentially leading to different conclusions from the same dataset. This subjectivity can be both a strength and a limitation; while it allows for richer, context-sensitive interpretations, it also raises questions about researcher bias and the objectivity of conclusions drawn from the data (Smith, 2015). Consequently, it becomes essential for researchers to engage in reflexivity, critically reflecting on their influences and biases throughout the research process (Finlay, 2002).

Moreover, the subjective nature of transpersonal phenomena can lead to diverse interpretations of the same experiences across different cultural or individual contexts. For example, an experience deemed spiritual or transformative in one cultural context may be interpreted differently in another, affecting how findings are understood and applied (Wulff, 1997). This variability underscores the need for a culturally sensitive approach in interpreting research findings, as what may be considered a peak experience in one tradition might not hold the same significance in another. By acknowledging the role of subjectivity in interpretation, researchers can strive for a more nuanced understanding of transpersonal phenomena, ultimately contributing to a more comprehensive and empathetic body of knowledge.

Participant Perspectives

The perspectives of participants are crucial in shaping research outcomes, especially in the field of transpersonal psychology, where individual experiences are inherently subjective and deeply personal. Participants’ narratives offer rich insights into their spiritual journeys, peak experiences, and other transformative phenomena. However, these narratives are influenced by various factors, including personal history, cultural background, and social environment (Chandler et al., 2007). Thus, the participant’s voice becomes an integral part of the research process, as their interpretation of their experiences can significantly influence the data collected and the conclusions drawn (Ponterotto, 2005). Recognizing the validity and importance of participants’ perspectives is essential for capturing the essence of transpersonal experiences and ensuring that their narratives are represented authentically.

Additionally, the ethical considerations surrounding participant perspectives are paramount in transpersonal research. Researchers must navigate the responsibility of representing participants’ experiences accurately and sensitively, particularly when dealing with topics that may be deeply personal or vulnerable (Willoughby, 2011). This ethical obligation involves not only accurately conveying participants’ voices but also being mindful of the potential impact of the research on their lives. For instance, researchers should ensure that participants feel safe and respected throughout the research process and that their experiences are not misinterpreted or trivialized. By prioritizing participant perspectives and ethical considerations, researchers can enhance the integrity of their work, fostering a more respectful and inclusive approach to understanding transpersonal phenomena.

Implications for Theory and Practice

The implications of subjectivity for theory and practice in transpersonal psychology are significant. By recognizing the role of subjectivity in shaping experiences and interpretations, researchers and practitioners can develop more inclusive theoretical frameworks that account for the diverse ways individuals engage with transpersonal phenomena. This broader understanding can lead to the emergence of new models and concepts that better reflect the complexity of human experience, such as the integration of spirituality into psychological well-being (MacDonald, 2000). Moreover, acknowledging subjectivity can foster interdisciplinary collaborations, as researchers draw from various fields—including psychology, sociology, anthropology, and religious studies—to enrich their understanding of transpersonal experiences (Walsh & Vaughan, 1993).

In practice, the recognition of subjectivity emphasizes the importance of personalized approaches in therapeutic settings. Therapists and practitioners who understand the subjective nature of their clients’ experiences can tailor interventions that resonate with individual beliefs, values, and contexts (Cash & Gray, 2019). This personalized approach not only enhances the therapeutic alliance but also promotes a more holistic view of mental health and well-being. For instance, incorporating clients’ spiritual beliefs and experiences into therapeutic discussions can facilitate deeper understanding and promote healing (Ruhala & Edwards, 2020). Ultimately, embracing subjectivity in transpersonal research can lead to more relevant theories and practices that honor the diversity of human experience, fostering greater awareness and appreciation for the transformative aspects of spirituality and consciousness.

Case Studies in Transpersonal Research

Peak Experiences

Peak experiences, often described as moments of intense joy, insight, or transcendence, serve as significant subjects in transpersonal research, providing valuable insights into human consciousness and personal growth. One illustrative case study is that of an individual who experienced a peak moment during a hiking expedition in a remote wilderness area. During this experience, the participant reported profound feelings of interconnectedness with nature, a deep sense of peace, and a heightened awareness of the present moment (Maslow, 1964). Through in-depth qualitative interviews, researchers were able to explore the participant’s narratives, revealing not only the transformative impact of the experience but also how it shaped their worldview and subsequent behaviors. This study highlighted the importance of context in facilitating peak experiences, suggesting that environments conducive to introspection and reflection can enhance the likelihood of such profound encounters (Benson et al., 2019).

Moreover, another case study examined a group of individuals who reported recurring peak experiences associated with creative processes, such as painting or writing. Through qualitative analysis, researchers found that these experiences often led to increased self-awareness, emotional catharsis, and enhanced creativity (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Participants described these peak moments as instances where they felt “in the flow,” indicating a merging of self with the creative act, where time ceased to exist, and their work felt almost effortless. This research not only underscores the personal significance of peak experiences but also emphasizes their role in fostering creativity and self-actualization. By examining peak experiences through case studies, transpersonal researchers can gain deeper insights into how such moments influence individuals’ lives, enhancing both theoretical understanding and practical applications in personal development and psychotherapy.

Mystical Experiences

Mystical experiences, characterized by profound feelings of unity, transcendence, and altered states of consciousness, represent another key area of focus within transpersonal research. One notable case study involved a participant who underwent a mystical experience during a meditation retreat. The individual described feeling a sense of oneness with the universe, accompanied by vivid visual and auditory sensations, which led to a transformative understanding of their purpose in life (Grof, 2000). In-depth interviews revealed that the participant’s mystical experience not only altered their spiritual beliefs but also had a lasting impact on their emotional well-being, relationships, and overall life satisfaction. This case illustrates the potential for mystical experiences to serve as catalysts for personal transformation, highlighting their relevance in both psychological and spiritual contexts (Tacey, 2004).

Another significant study examined a group of individuals who had experienced mystical states induced by psychedelics, such as psilocybin or LSD, during therapeutic sessions. Researchers utilized qualitative interviews to explore the long-term effects of these experiences on participants’ psychological health, self-perception, and spiritual beliefs (Griffiths et al., 2006). Participants reported profound changes in their attitudes toward life, increased compassion, and enhanced feelings of connection to others and the universe. This research indicates that mystical experiences, whether spontaneous or induced, can have profound implications for mental health and well-being. By analyzing such case studies, transpersonal research can better understand the mechanisms through which mystical experiences facilitate healing, personal growth, and spiritual development, contributing to both theoretical advancements and practical applications in psychotherapy and wellness.

Transformative Learning

Transformative learning is a process by which individuals experience profound shifts in their beliefs, values, and perspectives, often triggered by significant life events or spiritual experiences. A compelling case study focused on a middle-aged woman who participated in a transpersonal workshop aimed at exploring personal spirituality. During the workshop, she engaged in various experiential exercises, including guided meditations and group discussions, that facilitated self-reflection and emotional exploration (Mezirow, 1991). Following the workshop, the participant reported a marked transformation in her understanding of herself and her relationships, describing a newfound sense of purpose and connection to a larger community. The qualitative analysis of her journey highlighted the role of group dynamics and supportive environments in fostering transformative learning experiences, demonstrating how shared exploration can catalyze personal growth (Dewey, 1938).

Another case study examined a cohort of graduate students engaged in a transpersonal psychology program, where they participated in experiential learning activities designed to enhance self-awareness and spiritual growth. Through a combination of qualitative interviews and reflective journals, researchers documented significant shifts in students’ perspectives on their personal and professional lives. Participants reported increased emotional resilience, a greater appreciation for diversity, and a commitment to integrating spiritual principles into their future practices (Sullivan & Smith, 2018). This study underscores the importance of transformative learning as a mechanism for personal and professional development in transpersonal contexts. By analyzing such case studies, transpersonal research can illuminate the pathways through which transformative learning occurs, providing insights that can inform educational practices and therapeutic interventions in the field.

Conclusion

In summary, the role of subjectivity in transpersonal research is both profound and multifaceted, significantly influencing the understanding and interpretation of transpersonal experiences. Subjectivity shapes not only the individual experiences of participants but also the perspectives of researchers, thereby affecting the outcomes and implications of research findings. By embracing the subjective nature of human experience, transpersonal psychology can better explore the complexities of spirituality, consciousness, and personal transformation, ultimately enriching the field with diverse insights and perspectives (Mays & Pope, 2000). This recognition of subjectivity encourages researchers to approach their work with humility, openness, and reflexivity, fostering an environment conducive to deeper exploration and understanding.

The methodological approaches employed in transpersonal research play a critical role in capturing the richness of subjective experiences. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods strategies each offer unique contributions to the understanding of transpersonal phenomena, allowing for a comprehensive examination of both individual narratives and broader trends (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017). By integrating these methodologies, researchers can harness the strengths of each approach, ensuring that the complexities of transpersonal experiences are adequately represented and understood. Furthermore, case studies on peak experiences, mystical states, and transformative learning illustrate the practical implications of subjectivity, demonstrating how personal narratives can illuminate theoretical frameworks and inform therapeutic practices (Grof, 2000; Sullivan & Smith, 2018).

Ultimately, the acknowledgment of subjectivity in transpersonal research not only enhances theoretical development but also promotes ethical and respectful practices in research and therapy. As practitioners and researchers strive to understand and support individuals on their spiritual journeys, it becomes imperative to honor the subjective voices of those they study and serve. By cultivating a deeper awareness of the impact of subjectivity on research outcomes, the field of transpersonal psychology can continue to evolve, fostering a greater appreciation for the diverse expressions of human experience and the profound potential for transformation inherent in each individual’s journey (Cash & Gray, 2019; Wulff, 1997).

Bibliography

  1. Benson, H., Wilkins, K., & Hase, S. (2019). Mindfulness meditation and the pursuit of peak experiences: Insights from a qualitative study. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 51(1), 23-39.
  2. Biggerstaff, D., & Thompson, A. R. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology: A review of qualitative research. Health Psychology Review, 2(3), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437190802365220
  3. Braud, W., & Anderson, R. (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experiences. Sage Publications.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  6. Cash, K., & Gray, J. (2019). The importance of spirituality in psychotherapy: A review of the literature. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 21(2), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2018.1471307
  7. Chandler, J., Meisenhelder, J. B., Tellez, M., & Roubidoux, M. A. (2007). Spirituality and well-being in cancer patients: A qualitative study. Psycho-Oncology, 16(5), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1025
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
  10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  11. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
  12. Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230201200403
  13. Finlay, L. (2008). A dance between the subjective and the objective: Reflecting on the lived experience. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802318045
  14. Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research methods. Heath Psychology Review, 13(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530050902960620
  15. Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford University Press.
  16. Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Johnson, M. W., & Rush, J. A. (2006). Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology, 187(3), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0457-5
  17. Grof, S. (2000). The future of psychology: The role of transpersonal psychology in the 21st century. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 32(1), 11-28.
  18. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row.
  19. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
  20. Kenny, M. (2011). Social desirability bias in survey research. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Psychometric Testing, 63, 175-188.
  21. MacDonald, D. A. (2000). Spirituality and well-being: A multidimensional framework. In W. R. Miller & H. Delaney (Eds.), The psychology of spirituality: A review of the literature (pp. 143-156). Wiley.
  22. MacDonald, D. A., & Holland, C. (2002). The development of a measure of spiritual transcendence. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 34(2), 117-132.
  23. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 320(7226), 50-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50
  24. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
  25. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
  26. Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and qualitative methods. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
  27. Ruhala, A. C., & Edwards, J. A. (2020). The impact of spirituality in psychotherapy: A qualitative study of therapists’ experiences. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 22(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2020.1759266
  28. Schwartz, S. (2010). The researcher as instrument: The importance of reflexivity in qualitative research. Research Methods in Psychology, 5, 47-67.
  29. Smith, J. A. (2015). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. SAGE Publications.
  30. Snyder, M., T. R., & Hogg, M. A. (2006). The impact of self-reported spiritual experiences on the psychological health of women: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(3), 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/1941-1022.1.3.236
  31. Sullivan, J. R., & Smith, J. A. (2018). Transformative learning in transpersonal psychology education: Student experiences and outcomes. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 37(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2018.37.1.31
  32. Tacey, D. (2004). The spirituality revolution: The emergence of contemporary spirituality. Routledge.
  33. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage Publications.
  34. Van Manen, M. (2014). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Althouse Press.
  35. Walsh, R., & Vaughan, F. (1993). Spirituality, psychology, and well-being. American Psychologist, 48(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.67
  36. Willoughby, T. (2011). Research ethics in qualitative research: The importance of participants’ perspectives. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111406225
  37. Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: A historical perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.
  38. Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., & Scott, A. B. (1997). The emerging meanings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prospects. Journal of Personality, 65(6), 905-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00357.x