Synchronicity, a concept introduced by Carl Jung, refers to meaningful coincidences that lack a causal relationship yet hold deep personal significance. This article explores the historical, psychological, and parapsychological dimensions of synchronicity, examining its origins in Jung’s work alongside physicist Wolfgang Pauli and its connections to Eastern philosophy. Psychological and philosophical interpretations highlight how synchronicity challenges traditional views of causality and reflects the workings of the collective unconscious. The article also reviews parapsychological research on synchronicity, including case studies and the relationship between synchronicity and psi phenomena. Applications of synchronicity in psychotherapy and everyday life are discussed, illustrating its impact on personal growth and decision-making. Finally, future research directions and the broader implications of synchronicity for parapsychology are considered, emphasizing its potential to deepen our understanding of interconnectedness and the nature of reality.
Introduction
Synchronicity, as conceptualized by Carl Jung, refers to the occurrence of meaningful coincidences that lack a direct causal relationship but hold significant subjective meaning for the individual experiencing them. Unlike events connected through cause and effect, synchronicities are connected by their meaning and the impact they have on one’s inner psychological state. Jung introduced this idea as an alternative to the strictly causal framework that dominates Western scientific thinking. His collaboration with physicist Wolfgang Pauli helped bridge the gap between psychology and quantum physics, suggesting that such events may be manifestations of deeper patterns within the universe that we do not yet fully understand (Jung, 1972). These experiences, though often dismissed by mainstream psychology, have a profound impact on individuals, especially in moments of personal transformation and crisis.
Synchronicity holds particular importance in the field of parapsychology because it challenges conventional understandings of reality and causality. In this realm, it intersects with phenomena such as telepathy, clairvoyance, and precognition, which also appear to defy linear cause-and-effect reasoning. Researchers in parapsychology explore synchronicity not just as a psychological event but as a potential indicator of psi phenomena—paranormal experiences that cannot be easily explained by known natural laws. These intersections open up possibilities for viewing the human mind as deeply interconnected with larger, non-ordinary realities (Kelly et al., 2007). Synchronicities, in this context, become more than mere coincidences—they suggest a meaningful connection between inner states and external events, hinting at a unified field of consciousness.
The study of synchronicity also resonates with broader transpersonal and spiritual perspectives. Transpersonal psychology, which focuses on experiences that transcend the personal ego, views synchronicities as pivotal moments of spiritual awakening and growth (Grof, 2008). They often occur in times of psychological crisis, major life transitions, or spiritual practice, providing individuals with a sense of purpose and alignment with the larger universe. These meaningful coincidences challenge the assumption that life events are random and emphasize a deep sense of interconnectedness between individual consciousness and the cosmos. As such, synchronicity is not only a concept within psychology but also a bridge between scientific inquiry, spiritual wisdom, and parapsychological exploration.
Historical and Conceptual Foundations of Synchronicity
Carl Jung and the Origins of Synchronicity
Carl Jung first introduced the concept of synchronicity in the 1920s, though it was not formally articulated until the 1950s. His work on synchronicity emerged from his interest in understanding the relationship between the inner world of the psyche and the outer world of events. Jung described synchronicity as “an acausal connecting principle” where inner psychological states and external events coincide in meaningful ways without a clear causal connection (Jung, 1972). He believed that these events were not random but reflected deeper archetypal patterns, which he linked to his theory of the collective unconscious. The collective unconscious, according to Jung, contains universal symbols and themes shared by all human beings, and it is through this realm that synchronicities often emerge. These coincidences, Jung argued, served as markers of psychological transformation, particularly in times of personal crisis or spiritual growth.
Jung’s collaboration with physicist Wolfgang Pauli further refined his understanding of synchronicity. Pauli, a Nobel laureate in quantum physics, shared Jung’s interest in exploring the connection between mind and matter. Together, they speculated that synchronicity could be related to quantum phenomena, where seemingly unrelated events influence each other in ways that challenge classical physics (Main, 2007). This interdisciplinary dialogue between psychology and physics helped lay the foundation for the modern understanding of synchronicity, which incorporates both psychological and metaphysical dimensions. Jung’s concept has since influenced not only the field of psychology but also parapsychology, where researchers explore the potential relationship between synchronicity and psychic phenomena.
Synchronicity in Eastern Philosophy and Mysticism
While Jung is credited with coining the term “synchronicity,” the underlying concept bears striking similarities to ideas found in Eastern philosophy and mysticism. Taoism, for instance, speaks of the Tao, or “the Way,” which refers to the natural order of the universe that flows harmoniously through all things. In the I Ching, an ancient Chinese divination text, synchronicities are seen as moments when the Tao is particularly evident, and meaningful coincidences occur as a result of one’s alignment with this cosmic flow (Wilhelm, 1967). Jung himself acknowledged the influence of the I Ching on his work, frequently using the text in his psychological practice and drawing connections between its principles and his theory of synchronicity.
Similarly, Buddhist and Hindu traditions contain concepts that parallel synchronicity. In Buddhism, the law of dependent origination suggests that all events are interconnected and arise in relation to each other, transcending the notion of individual, isolated causes and effects (Suzuki, 1956). Hinduism, particularly through its understanding of karma and dharma, suggests that seemingly random events are part of a larger, divine order. Jung’s fascination with these Eastern ideas highlights the cross-cultural roots of synchronicity, emphasizing that it is not merely a Western psychological construct but a universal concept embedded in the spiritual and philosophical traditions of many cultures. This intercultural resonance adds depth to the study of synchronicity in parapsychology, suggesting that meaningful coincidences may be expressions of universal principles governing both consciousness and reality.
Psychological and Philosophical Interpretations
Psychological Explanations
From a psychological perspective, synchronicity can be understood through various cognitive and perceptual mechanisms that shape how individuals interpret their experiences. One explanation involves pattern recognition, a fundamental aspect of human cognition. The brain is wired to detect patterns in the environment as a means of making sense of the world, a process that is crucial for survival. However, this same ability can lead individuals to perceive connections between unrelated events, giving rise to meaningful coincidences (Shermer, 2009). This phenomenon, known as apophenia, is often cited as a potential psychological basis for synchronicity. In such cases, individuals may unknowingly project personal meaning onto random events, interpreting them as interconnected due to their own psychological needs or expectations.
Another psychological mechanism at play in synchronicity is selective attention, where individuals unconsciously filter and focus on certain stimuli while ignoring others. This selective focus often leads to the heightened perception of coincidences that align with one’s internal thoughts, emotions, or desires. Cognitive biases such as confirmation bias also contribute to the experience of synchronicity, as individuals are more likely to notice events that confirm their existing beliefs or expectations (Nickerson, 1998). For instance, someone who is contemplating a major life change may become more attuned to external signs that seem to validate their decision, interpreting these occurrences as synchronistic. While these cognitive explanations offer insight into how synchronicities may arise, they do not fully account for the profound sense of meaning and emotional impact that often accompanies such experiences.
In therapeutic settings, synchronicity has been explored as a psychologically meaningful event that can foster insight and healing. Jung believed that synchronicities often occur during times of psychological transition, such as the individuation process, where individuals integrate unconscious material into consciousness (Jung, 1972). These meaningful coincidences can act as symbols of deeper psychological processes, reflecting unconscious conflicts or desires. In this context, synchronicity serves as a bridge between the conscious and unconscious mind, providing individuals with a sense of guidance and coherence. This perspective has been adopted in various therapeutic modalities, including transpersonal psychology, where synchronicities are viewed as valuable tools for personal growth and transformation (Grof, 2008).
Philosophical Inquiry into Causality and Meaning
Philosophically, synchronicity challenges traditional notions of causality, particularly the mechanistic, linear models that dominate Western scientific thought. Classical science is based on the principle of cause and effect, where events are assumed to have a clear, identifiable cause that leads to a specific outcome. Synchronicity, however, presents a different kind of connection between events—one that is acausal but still meaningful. This acausal connection suggests that events may be linked not through physical causation but through their symbolic significance. Such a perspective aligns with phenomenology, a philosophical approach that emphasizes the subjective experience of meaning over objective causality (Merleau-Ponty, 1962). In synchronicity, meaning takes precedence, as the individual perceives a deep connection between inner psychological states and outer events.
This philosophical shift has profound implications for how we understand reality. Synchronicity implies that there may be underlying principles governing the universe that transcend cause and effect, opening the door to metaphysical inquiries about the nature of consciousness and reality. Jung suggested that synchronicity reflects a “unus mundus,” or unified world, where mind and matter are interconnected on a fundamental level (Jung, 1972). This view resonates with non-dualistic philosophies found in Eastern traditions, which posit that all phenomena are interconnected and that the distinction between inner and outer reality is ultimately illusory. Thus, synchronicity invites a re-examination of the boundaries between subjectivity and objectivity, challenging the reductionist worldview that dominates much of Western philosophy and science.
Moreover, synchronicity raises important questions about the role of meaning in human life. Existentialist and phenomenological philosophers have long argued that meaning is not inherent in the world but is constructed through human experience (Heidegger, 1962). In this light, synchronicity can be seen as a moment when individuals assign personal meaning to seemingly random events, imbuing them with significance. The profound emotional impact of synchronicities, often described as awe-inspiring or transformative, suggests that these experiences tap into a deep need for meaning and coherence in a seemingly chaotic world. Philosophically, synchronicity invites a reconsideration of how meaning is constructed and the extent to which personal experience shapes our understanding of reality.
Synchronicity and the Collective Unconscious
Central to Jung’s theory of synchronicity is the concept of the collective unconscious, a deep layer of the unconscious mind that contains universal symbols and archetypes shared by all humanity. Jung proposed that synchronicities arise from the activation of these archetypal forces within the collective unconscious, which manifest through meaningful coincidences in the external world (Jung, 1972). Archetypes, such as the hero, the mother, or the shadow, represent fundamental patterns of human experience that transcend individual psychology. When an individual encounters a synchronistic event, it often reflects the activation of an archetype that resonates with their current psychological state, offering insight or guidance from the unconscious.
In this framework, synchronicities are not random but are expressions of deeper, archetypal dynamics that shape human experience. For example, someone going through a major life transition may experience a synchronistic event involving the death and rebirth archetype, symbolizing their psychological transformation. These archetypal symbols provide a bridge between the individual and the collective, linking personal experience to universal patterns that have been part of human consciousness for millennia (Main, 2007). This connection between the personal and the collective is what gives synchronicities their profound sense of meaning and significance, as they resonate with both the individual psyche and the larger, collective patterns of human existence.
The collective unconscious also explains why synchronicities often appear in times of psychological or spiritual crisis. Jung observed that synchronicities frequently occur during moments of intense emotional or psychological stress, when the boundaries between the conscious and unconscious mind become more permeable (Jung, 1972). In these moments, the unconscious seeks to communicate with the conscious mind, using synchronistic events as a vehicle for transmitting its message. Thus, synchronicities serve not only as personal milestones but also as indicators of larger, archetypal processes at work within the collective unconscious. This view situates synchronicity within a broader philosophical and psychological framework, highlighting its role as a meaningful bridge between the individual, the collective, and the cosmos.
Parapsychological Research on Synchronicity
Experiments and Case Studies
In parapsychology, synchronicity is explored not just as a psychological phenomenon but as a potential indication of psi (psychic) phenomena, such as telepathy, precognition, or clairvoyance. Researchers in this field have sought to gather empirical evidence of synchronicity by conducting controlled experiments and examining case studies. While the subjective nature of synchronicity presents challenges in scientific measurement, some notable efforts have been made. For example, Rhine and Pratt (1957) conducted early research on psi phenomena that, while not directly related to synchronicity, provided a foundation for exploring meaningful coincidences through experiments involving telepathy and precognition. These studies revealed that individuals occasionally demonstrated above-chance performance in predicting random events, which some parapsychologists link to synchronistic experiences.
One of the most well-known case studies involving synchronicity in parapsychology is the experience of Arthur Koestler, a philosopher and writer who extensively documented meaningful coincidences in his own life and those of others. Koestler believed that synchronicity could be a manifestation of psi phenomena, and he reported numerous personal experiences that defied rational explanation (Koestler, 1972). His work prompted further exploration of synchronicity within the context of psi, as many of the coincidences he described involved precognitive dreams or intuitive knowledge of future events. Such case studies, while anecdotal, provide valuable qualitative data for parapsychological research, highlighting the potential for synchronicity to be more than a psychological projection of meaning but instead a glimpse into non-ordinary reality.
Despite the intriguing nature of these findings, parapsychological research on synchronicity remains limited by methodological challenges. The subjective interpretation of meaningful coincidences varies greatly from person to person, making it difficult to develop standardized protocols for scientific inquiry. Furthermore, the non-replicable and spontaneous nature of synchronicity complicates attempts to study it under controlled conditions. As a result, while case studies and anecdotal reports offer compelling insights, synchronicity remains an elusive and enigmatic phenomenon for empirical research. Nevertheless, the intersection of synchronicity and psi phenomena continues to intrigue researchers, offering a rich field of inquiry into the nature of consciousness and reality.
Methodological Challenges
One of the primary challenges in studying synchronicity within parapsychology is its acausal nature, which stands in contrast to the causal frameworks typically employed in scientific research. Traditional scientific methods rely on establishing clear cause-and-effect relationships between variables, but synchronicity defies this logic, presenting events that are meaningfully related without a direct causal link. This poses a significant problem for researchers attempting to create reproducible experiments. As Jung (1972) himself noted, synchronicities are spontaneous, and their occurrence cannot be predicted or controlled in a laboratory setting, which makes it difficult to test hypotheses or replicate results in a systematic way.
Additionally, the subjective nature of synchronicity complicates its study. What one individual perceives as a profound synchronicity may appear as a mere coincidence to another. This subjectivity introduces biases that are difficult to account for in experimental design. Confirmation bias, for instance, may lead individuals to selectively notice and remember events that align with their internal psychological states or expectations (Nickerson, 1998). To mitigate this, parapsychologists have attempted to develop more rigorous methodologies, including double-blind experimental designs and statistical analyses aimed at detecting above-chance correlations in psi experiments. However, these methods have not yet yielded conclusive evidence that synchronicity can be reliably measured or predicted.
Another challenge lies in the interdisciplinary nature of synchronicity, which bridges psychology, physics, and parapsychology. This makes it difficult to categorize and study within the confines of any single discipline. Synchronicity has been linked to quantum theory, particularly in its challenge to classical notions of causality and time (Main, 2007). Some researchers, inspired by Jung’s collaboration with Pauli, suggest that synchronicities may be related to quantum entanglement, where particles can influence each other instantaneously across vast distances, defying the usual constraints of space and time. While this analogy is speculative, it points to the need for new models of understanding that go beyond traditional scientific paradigms to account for the complexity of synchronistic experiences.
Potential Correlations with Psi Phenomena
Synchronicity shares several features with psi phenomena, such as telepathy, clairvoyance, and precognition, leading some parapsychologists to speculate that these occurrences may be different manifestations of the same underlying process. For instance, both synchronicity and psi involve the perception of connections between seemingly unrelated events or pieces of information, often in ways that defy logical explanation. In the case of precognition, individuals may experience synchronistic events that appear to provide insight into future occurrences, blurring the line between meaningful coincidence and psychic awareness (Radin, 1997). This has led to hypotheses that synchronicities may sometimes represent subconscious psi processes at work, where the individual is unknowingly accessing information beyond ordinary perception.
Furthermore, telepathy and synchronicity both involve a heightened sense of connection between individuals or events, often transcending the usual boundaries of space and time. Telepathic synchronicities, where two people simultaneously experience the same thought or event without any direct communication, have been documented in parapsychological literature as instances where psi and synchronicity may intersect (Krippner & Ullman, 1973). Such cases provide further evidence for the potential overlap between these two phenomena, suggesting that synchronicity could function as a bridge between conscious and unconscious awareness, allowing for the emergence of psi information in everyday life.
Despite the compelling correlations between synchronicity and psi, the exact nature of this relationship remains speculative. Some researchers propose that synchronicity represents an external manifestation of psi abilities, while others suggest that both phenomena arise from a deeper, non-local consciousness or collective unconscious (Main, 2007). However, definitive proof of these connections remains elusive due to the methodological limitations discussed earlier. As parapsychological research evolves, further investigation into the relationship between synchronicity and psi phenomena could shed light on how these experiences operate within the broader context of consciousness studies.
Synchronicity in Everyday Life and Applications
Personal and Collective Implications
Synchronicity has profound implications for individuals, especially in the realm of personal decision-making and life transitions. Many people report experiencing synchronicities during times of significant change, such as career shifts, relationship decisions, or spiritual awakenings. These meaningful coincidences often act as psychological markers, offering a sense of guidance or validation when individuals are confronted with uncertainty. For example, someone contemplating a new job might experience a series of coincidences—such as meeting people from the new field or repeatedly encountering symbols related to the job—that seem to confirm the rightness of the decision. Jung believed that such events are not merely random but are moments when the unconscious mind communicates with the conscious, providing direction or insight (Jung, 1972). The emotional and psychological impact of these synchronicities can be profound, instilling a sense of purpose and alignment with a larger, meaningful order.
On a collective level, synchronicity also plays a role in shaping cultural and social narratives. In moments of collective crisis, such as natural disasters or significant political events, individuals and communities often report experiencing synchronicities that offer symbolic meaning to the broader situation. For instance, after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, many people described synchronistic experiences, such as dreams, symbols, or encounters that seemed to resonate with the larger national trauma. These experiences can foster a sense of collective consciousness, where people feel more interconnected and attuned to shared emotional or psychological undercurrents. Thus, synchronicity is not only a personal phenomenon but also one that has the potential to weave together individual experiences into a larger, collective narrative (Main, 2007).
In therapeutic settings, synchronicity has been explored as a tool for personal growth and healing. Transpersonal psychology, in particular, views synchronicities as valuable opportunities for psychological integration and self-awareness (Grof, 2008). When a client reports a synchronistic event in therapy, it is often interpreted as a sign that unconscious material is emerging into consciousness, offering insight into unresolved psychological issues. Therapists may encourage clients to reflect on the personal significance of these events, using them as a means of exploring deeper emotional or spiritual themes. In this way, synchronicity serves as a bridge between the conscious and unconscious mind, facilitating healing and transformation.
Practical Applications
In addition to their psychological and therapeutic significance, synchronicities have practical applications in fields such as business, creativity, and leadership. In the business world, synchronicity has been used as a tool for decision-making and problem-solving, especially in uncertain or ambiguous situations. Entrepreneurs and business leaders often report experiencing synchronistic events that guide their decision-making processes. For example, a leader might encounter a seemingly random event—such as meeting a key collaborator by chance—that significantly influences the direction of a project or business venture. These experiences are often interpreted as moments of intuitive insight, where the unconscious mind aligns with external circumstances to provide clarity or direction (Jaworski, 1996). In this context, synchronicity is not merely a psychological curiosity but a practical tool for navigating complex, rapidly changing environments.
Synchronicity is also frequently reported in creative fields, where artists, writers, and musicians describe moments of inspiration that seem to arise from a synchronistic alignment of ideas, symbols, or events. Many creative individuals experience what they describe as “flow,” a state of heightened concentration and immersion in their work that is often accompanied by synchronistic events. For instance, an artist may find that certain symbols or themes unexpectedly appear in their work, only to later discover their personal significance or connection to external events. Jung’s theory of the collective unconscious suggests that such moments of inspiration may be linked to archetypal symbols emerging from the unconscious, offering creative insight that resonates with both the individual and the collective (Jung, 1972). As such, synchronicity serves as a source of creative inspiration, offering guidance and meaning in the artistic process.
Moreover, synchronicity has been applied in the context of leadership and organizational development. Leaders who are attuned to synchronicities often report using these meaningful coincidences to inform their decision-making and vision for the future. In his book Synchronicity: The Inner Path of Leadership, Joseph Jaworski (1996) argues that synchronicity plays a crucial role in visionary leadership, where leaders are able to sense and respond to underlying patterns and connections that others might overlook. By paying attention to synchronistic events, leaders can tap into deeper sources of wisdom and insight, guiding their organizations in ways that align with both internal and external forces. This approach to leadership emphasizes the importance of intuition, interconnectedness, and the ability to navigate uncertainty with openness to meaningful coincidences.
Synchronicity in Popular Culture
Synchronicity has captured the imagination of popular culture, appearing in literature, film, music, and media as a symbol of fate, destiny, or divine intervention. In literature, the theme of synchronicity is often used to explore the mysterious connections between characters and events, such as in Paulo Coelho’s The Alchemist (1988), where the protagonist experiences a series of synchronistic events that guide him on his journey toward self-discovery. Similarly, in film, synchronicity is frequently depicted as a means of exploring the interconnectedness of human experience. Movies like The Matrix (1999) or Donnie Darko (2001) depict characters who encounter synchronistic events that challenge their understanding of reality and suggest the presence of a hidden order or purpose behind their lives (Briggs, 2011). These cultural representations of synchronicity resonate with audiences because they tap into a universal human desire for meaning and coherence in an often chaotic and unpredictable world.
In the world of music, the concept of synchronicity has been explored in both lyrics and album themes. The rock band The Police famously titled their 1983 album Synchronicity, which was inspired by Jung’s work on meaningful coincidences. The album’s title track reflects on the idea of hidden connections between people and events, suggesting that there is an unseen force guiding these interactions. Such cultural references to synchronicity highlight its pervasive influence and its role as a symbol of interconnectedness, destiny, and deeper meaning (Ames, 1997). Popular culture’s fascination with synchronicity underscores its enduring appeal as a concept that resonates across both personal and collective experiences.
Overall, synchronicity has permeated various forms of media, reinforcing its status as a cultural and psychological phenomenon that speaks to the human quest for meaning. Whether in literature, film, music, or art, the concept of synchronicity continues to inspire creators and audiences alike, offering a lens through which to view the mysteries of life and the underlying connections between individuals, events, and the cosmos.
Conclusion
Synchronicity, as introduced by Carl Jung, remains a concept that bridges psychology, philosophy, and parapsychology, offering insights into the profound connections between internal psychological states and external events. Through its acausal nature, synchronicity challenges traditional scientific models of causality and invites a deeper exploration of how meaningful coincidences can reflect both individual psychological processes and collective unconscious dynamics (Jung, 1972). The historical foundations of synchronicity, drawing from Jung’s collaboration with Wolfgang Pauli and its resonance with Eastern philosophies, demonstrate that it is not merely a psychological anomaly but a phenomenon that has been recognized across cultures as a marker of deeper, interconnected truths (Main, 2007). Synchronicity, therefore, serves as both a psychological and spiritual phenomenon that enriches our understanding of consciousness and reality.
Parapsychological research on synchronicity, although methodologically challenging, has shown potential correlations between synchronicity and psi phenomena, such as telepathy, precognition, and clairvoyance. While empirical studies have not yet conclusively proven the connection between synchronicity and psychic abilities, case studies and anecdotal reports provide intriguing evidence that synchronicity may serve as a bridge between ordinary and non-ordinary experiences (Radin, 1997; Koestler, 1972). Despite the limitations of studying such an acausal and spontaneous phenomenon, synchronicity continues to intrigue researchers in parapsychology, who view it as a doorway to understanding the subtle interactions between mind, matter, and the broader cosmos (Main, 2007).
In everyday life, synchronicity holds practical significance, particularly in personal decision-making, creativity, and leadership. Its role in therapy and transpersonal psychology highlights its potential as a tool for psychological growth and self-awareness (Grof, 2008). Moreover, synchronicity’s pervasive presence in popular culture, literature, and art underscores its deep resonance with the human desire for meaning and coherence in a complex and unpredictable world. Ultimately, synchronicity remains an essential concept that enriches our understanding of human consciousness and its connection to both the individual psyche and the larger, interconnected universe. Future research in parapsychology and related fields may further elucidate its role in human experience, offering new ways of understanding how meaning, consciousness, and reality are intertwined.
Bibliography
- Ames, K. (1997). Synchronicity: Multiple meanings in the work of Carl Jung and contemporary culture. University of Chicago Press.
- Briggs, J. (2011). The synchronicity key: The hidden intelligence guiding the universe and you. Hay House, Inc.
- Coelho, P. (1988). The alchemist. HarperCollins.
- Grof, S. (2008). The ultimate journey: Consciousness and the mystery of death. Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies.
- Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row.
- Jaworski, J. (1996). Synchronicity: The inner path of leadership. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Jung, C. G. (1972). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. Princeton University Press.
- Kelly, E. F., Kelly, E. W., Crabtree, A., Gauld, A., Grosso, M., & Greyson, B. (2007). Irreducible mind: Toward a psychology for the 21st century. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Koestler, A. (1972). The roots of coincidence. Vintage.
- Krippner, S., & Ullman, M. (1973). Telepathy and dreams: A controlled experiment with electroencephalogram and eye-movement recording. International Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 9, 289-294.
- Main, R. (2007). Revelations of chance: Synchronicity as spiritual experience. State University of New York Press.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
- Radin, D. (1997). The conscious universe: The scientific truth of psychic phenomena. HarperCollins.
- Rhine, J. B., & Pratt, J. G. (1957). Parapsychology: Frontier science of the mind. Thomas.
- Shermer, M. (2009). The believing brain: From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies—How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. Henry Holt and Company.
- Suzuki, D. T. (1956). Zen Buddhism: Selected writings. Doubleday.
- Wilhelm, R. (1967). The I Ching or book of changes (C. F. Baynes, Trans.). Princeton University Press.