This article explores the phenomenon of poltergeists through both psychological and paranormal lenses, providing a comprehensive overview of the competing explanations for these reported disturbances. From the psychological perspective, it examines cognitive biases, psychodynamic theories, and sociocultural factors that contribute to the perception of poltergeist activity, including the impact of repressed emotions, stress, and environmental influences. The paranormal perspective delves into theories of psychokinesis (PK), spirit entities, and alternative quantum hypotheses, drawing on notable case studies to illustrate these ideas. An integrative approach is also considered, analyzing cases where both psychological and paranormal factors are at play. By critically reviewing skeptical arguments and discussing ethical concerns in investigating such cases, the article emphasizes the importance of a balanced, open, yet scientifically rigorous approach in understanding poltergeist phenomena.
Introduction
Poltergeist phenomena, derived from the German word meaning “noisy spirit,” refer to instances of inexplicable disturbances, such as objects moving without visible cause, unexplained sounds, or other sensory manifestations attributed to a supernatural force. Reports of poltergeist activity date back centuries and have been documented across cultures, often described as disruptive and sometimes malevolent. In folklore, poltergeists are often associated with spirits or entities that cause physical disturbances in homes or other environments, but contemporary interest in the phenomenon has drawn attention from both paranormal researchers and psychologists alike. The dual nature of these phenomena—encompassing both psychological and paranormal elements—has led to considerable debate about their origins and validity (Gauld & Cornell, 2017).
From a psychological standpoint, poltergeist activity can be seen as a projection of internal psychological conflicts, repressed emotions, or cognitive biases. Researchers have posited that individuals, particularly adolescents undergoing emotional stress, may inadvertently manifest these disturbances through unconscious psychokinetic abilities, though these theories remain speculative. Some psychologists argue that poltergeist cases may be explained by perceptual errors, memory distortions, or social contagion, whereby an initial ambiguous event is interpreted through a supernatural lens, thus reinforcing the belief in paranormal activity (Lange & Houran, 2011). Cognitive biases, such as pareidolia, which involves seeing patterns or significance in random stimuli, play a significant role in how individuals interpret unusual occurrences as poltergeist phenomena (Irwin, 2014).
Conversely, paranormal explanations focus on the possibility of genuine supernatural events, often tied to psychokinesis (PK) or the influence of discarnate entities. In parapsychology, psychokinesis refers to the ability of the mind to influence physical objects without any physical interaction, and this concept has been central to many theories explaining poltergeist activity. Researchers in the field of paranormal studies have investigated numerous cases that seem to defy psychological explanations, often attributing these occurrences to unobservable forces or energy fields (Rogo, 2019). Despite widespread skepticism in the scientific community, these phenomena remain a point of fascination for many, highlighting the complexities of investigating occurrences that exist at the intersection of psychology and the paranormal.
Psychological Explanations
Cognitive and Perceptual Biases
Poltergeist phenomena can often be attributed to cognitive and perceptual biases, which shape how individuals interpret ambiguous or anomalous experiences. Cognitive psychology has demonstrated that the human brain is wired to find patterns and meaning in the environment, even where none exist, a phenomenon known as pareidolia (Irwin, 2014). This tendency can lead to the misinterpretation of random or coincidental events as supernatural occurrences. For instance, when a household object falls or a strange noise is heard, the mind may assign these events a paranormal cause if they fit within a pre-existing belief system. Confirmation bias, which is the tendency to search for or interpret information that confirms one’s beliefs, also plays a significant role in reinforcing the perception that these disturbances are the result of poltergeist activity (Lange & Houran, 2011).
In addition to perceptual biases, memory distortions can further contribute to the misinterpretation of events as poltergeist activity. Psychological research has shown that memories are not static; they are reconstructive and influenced by current beliefs and emotions (Loftus, 2005). In poltergeist cases, initial ambiguous events may be misremembered or exaggerated over time, especially if an individual strongly believes in the paranormal. The reconstruction of memories in line with such beliefs can lead to the creation of a narrative that supports the idea of ongoing poltergeist activity, even when natural explanations could account for the occurrences. Studies have also indicated that individuals who report paranormal experiences are more prone to cognitive-perceptual personality traits, such as fantasy proneness and dissociation, which make them more likely to perceive ambiguous events as paranormal (Irwin, 2014).
The influence of suggestion must also be considered when evaluating poltergeist claims. Social and environmental factors, such as the presence of a paranormal investigator or media reports, can amplify the expectation that poltergeist activity is taking place. These external influences can create a feedback loop, where each new event is interpreted in the context of previous ones, further reinforcing the belief in a supernatural cause. Researchers Lange and Houran (2011) developed a model that suggests that suggestion, in combination with cognitive-perceptual traits, plays a central role in the development and persistence of paranormal experiences, including poltergeist activity.
Psychodynamic Theories
Psychodynamic explanations for poltergeist phenomena focus on the unconscious mind, particularly the expression of repressed emotions or unresolved psychological conflicts. Sigmund Freud’s theories of the unconscious mind laid the groundwork for understanding how inner turmoil could manifest in external events (Freud, 1961). In the context of poltergeist phenomena, it has been suggested that individuals, often adolescents, experiencing psychological stress may unconsciously project this distress in the form of unexplained physical disturbances. This is particularly prevalent in cases where a “focus person” or “agent” is identified—someone around whom the poltergeist activity seems to center (Gauld & Cornell, 2017).
Adolescence is a period marked by intense emotional and psychological changes, which may explain why many reported cases of poltergeist activity occur in households with teenagers. The psychodynamic model posits that the repressed emotions associated with the challenges of growing up, such as frustration, anger, or fear, can be externalized in the form of psychokinetic phenomena (Carr, 2014). In this view, poltergeist phenomena are not caused by an external entity or force, but rather by the mind’s attempt to cope with overwhelming psychological pressures. Some case studies have reported a decrease in poltergeist activity once the emotional conflicts of the individual were addressed through psychotherapy or other forms of intervention (Rogo, 2019).
Furthermore, psychodynamic theories suggest that poltergeist activity can serve as a symbolic expression of unresolved familial tensions. In many cases, disturbances occur in homes where there is significant emotional or relational discord, and the poltergeist activity can be viewed as an unconscious expression of these underlying tensions (Carr, 2014). The externalization of these conflicts through poltergeist phenomena allows individuals to avoid direct confrontation of the issues while still providing a physical manifestation of their emotional state. Although psychodynamic explanations are speculative and difficult to test empirically, they offer a compelling psychological framework for understanding certain poltergeist cases, particularly those involving adolescents in highly charged emotional environments.
Sociocultural and Environmental Factors
Sociocultural and environmental factors also play a significant role in shaping how individuals experience and interpret poltergeist phenomena. The cultural context in which a person lives can heavily influence their beliefs about the supernatural, including poltergeists. In societies where belief in spirits or ghosts is prevalent, people are more likely to attribute unusual occurrences to paranormal forces (Radin, 2018). These beliefs are often passed down through folklore, religious teachings, and media portrayals, creating a cultural framework within which poltergeist activity is understood. In such contexts, ambiguous or inexplicable events are more readily interpreted as supernatural, especially in households where traditional beliefs about spirits are strong (Irwin, 2014).
Environmental stressors, such as family dynamics, can also contribute to the emergence of poltergeist experiences. Research has shown that poltergeist activity is often reported in households experiencing significant tension, such as marital conflict, financial hardship, or health issues (Gauld & Cornell, 2017). These stressors may create an environment ripe for the projection of internal conflicts onto external events. Some psychologists argue that poltergeist activity can be seen as a form of “social stress relief,” where the focus on paranormal disturbances diverts attention away from more immediate, difficult-to-address problems within the family (Carr, 2014). By externalizing these issues through the lens of paranormal activity, individuals and families may find a temporary means of coping with stress.
In addition to familial and cultural factors, the role of the media cannot be overlooked. Popular portrayals of poltergeists in films, television, and literature have shaped public perceptions of the phenomenon, often sensationalizing it and reinforcing the belief in its paranormal origins (Radin, 2018). Media depictions can influence individuals to interpret personal experiences through the framework of poltergeist activity, especially when similar patterns of disturbances are depicted in fictional accounts. This cultural reinforcement, combined with existing psychological predispositions and environmental stressors, creates fertile ground for the perception and reporting of poltergeist phenomena.
Paranormal Explanations
Theories in Parapsychology: Psychokinesis (PK)
One of the most prevalent paranormal explanations for poltergeist phenomena is psychokinesis (PK), the ability of the mind to influence physical objects without any direct physical interaction. In the field of parapsychology, PK has been proposed as a potential mechanism for the disturbances associated with poltergeist activity, such as the movement of objects, knocking sounds, or electrical interference (Rogo, 2019). Proponents of this theory suggest that individuals, often referred to as “focus persons,” subconsciously generate PK forces during times of emotional distress, resulting in the physical manifestations typical of poltergeist cases. Adolescents, in particular, are frequently identified as the agents of such phenomena, likely due to the intense psychological and emotional changes they experience during puberty (Gauld & Cornell, 2017).
Research into psychokinesis has been conducted primarily through controlled laboratory settings, often using random event generators (REGs) to detect mental influence on physical systems (Radin, 2018). Although some experimental studies claim to have demonstrated small but statistically significant PK effects, these findings remain highly controversial and have yet to be widely accepted by mainstream science. The spontaneous and unpredictable nature of poltergeist activity further complicates efforts to scientifically investigate PK in real-world cases, as the conditions necessary for such phenomena are difficult to replicate or observe systematically. Despite these challenges, PK remains a central theory in parapsychological explanations of poltergeist activity, with researchers continuing to explore its potential as a genuine paranormal phenomenon.
Several well-known poltergeist cases have been cited as supporting evidence for the psychokinesis hypothesis. The Enfield poltergeist case, for example, involved a series of physical disturbances—ranging from furniture movement to inexplicable sounds—that appeared to center around a teenage girl (Playfair, 2011). Investigators, including parapsychologists, suggested that the girl may have been unconsciously manifesting PK due to the emotional turmoil she was experiencing. Similarly, the Rosenheim poltergeist case in Germany, which involved electrical malfunctions and object movements in a lawyer’s office, was attributed to a young office worker who was believed to be the source of the disturbances (Gauld & Cornell, 2017). These cases, while controversial, provide anecdotal support for the idea that PK could be responsible for certain types of poltergeist activity.
Spirits and Entities
Another prominent paranormal explanation for poltergeist activity involves the presence of spirits or discarnate entities. This interpretation has deep historical roots in spiritualism and folklore, where poltergeists are often seen as mischievous or malevolent spirits that cause disturbances to gain attention or communicate with the living. Spiritualist traditions, particularly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, frequently linked poltergeist phenomena with the actions of departed souls who were either trapped between worlds or seeking resolution for unfinished business (Fodor, 2012). In these cases, mediums were often called upon to communicate with the spirits and facilitate their departure, thereby ending the disturbances.
Supporters of the spirit hypothesis argue that many poltergeist cases involve behaviors and events that seem too complex or purposeful to be explained by random psychokinetic forces alone. For instance, objects may move in specific patterns, messages may be conveyed through sounds or writing, or there may be interactions that suggest a level of intelligence behind the disturbances (Playfair, 2011). Proponents also point to cases where multiple witnesses observe the same phenomenon, arguing that this collective experience strengthens the case for an external force, such as a spirit, as the cause. In some instances, poltergeist phenomena are linked to specific locations, such as haunted houses or sites of historical trauma, which further suggests that the disturbances may be tied to the presence of restless spirits (Fodor, 2012).
However, the spirit hypothesis is not without its critics, even within the paranormal community. Some parapsychologists argue that invoking spirits or entities as explanations introduces unnecessary metaphysical assumptions that cannot be empirically tested or validated. Furthermore, skeptics point out that many poltergeist cases, when investigated thoroughly, reveal natural explanations or deliberate hoaxes, casting doubt on the notion that spirits are responsible for the disturbances (Nickell, 2014). Despite these critiques, the belief in spirits as agents of poltergeist activity remains widespread in popular culture and continues to be a subject of interest in paranormal investigations.
Quantum and Energy Field Hypotheses
In recent years, alternative theories rooted in quantum physics and energy field concepts have emerged as potential explanations for poltergeist phenomena. Some researchers propose that poltergeist activity may be related to fluctuations in the earth’s electromagnetic fields or other types of environmental energy that interact with human consciousness in ways not yet fully understood (Radin, 2018). These energy field hypotheses suggest that certain individuals may be particularly sensitive to changes in environmental energy, which could trigger poltergeist-like phenomena. For example, high levels of electromagnetic radiation, which are known to affect human cognition and perception, have been recorded in some poltergeist cases, leading to speculation that these disturbances could be caused by natural energy fields rather than paranormal forces (Roll, 2015).
Quantum theories take this a step further, proposing that consciousness itself may have the ability to influence physical reality at a subatomic level. While still highly speculative, these ideas draw on the principles of quantum mechanics, which suggest that particles can exist in multiple states at once and can be influenced by observation (Radin, 2018). Some researchers argue that if consciousness has a quantum component, it might be able to interact with physical objects in ways that could explain the seemingly spontaneous and non-physical nature of poltergeist activity. Although these theories remain highly controversial and lack empirical support, they offer a novel perspective on how mind and matter might interact in ways that could produce the effects seen in poltergeist cases.
Critics of quantum and energy field hypotheses argue that these ideas are largely speculative and lack the rigorous scientific evidence needed to support them. Moreover, the application of quantum mechanics to macroscopic phenomena, such as poltergeist activity, is seen by many physicists as a misunderstanding of quantum principles, which typically operate at the atomic or subatomic level (Nickell, 2014). Nevertheless, these theories have gained attention in both paranormal research circles and popular media, reflecting a growing interest in bridging the gap between cutting-edge physics and unexplained phenomena.
Integrative Approaches and Case Studies
Combining Psychological and Paranormal Explanations
The complexities of poltergeist phenomena often challenge researchers to consider integrative models that combine both psychological and paranormal explanations. While traditional scientific approaches tend to favor psychological explanations rooted in cognitive biases, environmental stressors, and psychodynamic processes, these models sometimes fail to account for all reported experiences. As a result, some researchers have proposed integrative approaches that recognize the potential interplay between psychological states and paranormal forces, such as psychokinesis (PK) or the influence of external entities (Rogo, 2019). These integrative frameworks aim to bridge the gap between competing paradigms, offering a more holistic understanding of poltergeist cases.
One integrative model posits that emotional or psychological distress could act as a trigger for paranormal phenomena, such as PK. According to this view, an individual’s repressed emotions, particularly during periods of heightened stress or trauma, might create conditions that allow for the manifestation of psychokinetic disturbances (Carr, 2014). This aligns with psychodynamic theories that emphasize the role of unconscious conflicts, while also incorporating the possibility that these psychological forces might extend beyond the individual’s mind to affect the physical environment. In such cases, poltergeist activity could be seen as the result of a combination of psychological stress and paranormal energy, rather than being exclusively one or the other.
The focus on adolescents in poltergeist cases is a key example of how integrative approaches can be applied. Adolescents undergoing significant emotional upheavals are frequently at the center of poltergeist phenomena, as documented in both psychological and paranormal research (Gauld & Cornell, 2017). The psychological component often points to the developmental challenges of adolescence, including identity formation, hormonal changes, and family conflict. The paranormal explanation, however, suggests that these emotional states may somehow trigger psychokinetic forces, leading to disturbances in the physical environment. This integrative perspective allows for a more nuanced understanding of the connection between psychological states and paranormal phenomena.
In addition, integrative models often acknowledge that sociocultural factors, such as cultural beliefs in spirits or media portrayals of paranormal events, can influence the interpretation of poltergeist activity. For example, individuals who live in cultures with strong beliefs in spirits or ghosts may be more likely to interpret psychological disturbances or environmental anomalies as supernatural (Irwin, 2014). Conversely, individuals with less exposure to paranormal beliefs may favor psychological explanations, even in cases where phenomena defy conventional logic. By combining psychological, paranormal, and cultural perspectives, integrative approaches provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding the wide variety of experiences reported in poltergeist cases.
Case Studies: Examples of Integrative Explanations
Several well-documented poltergeist cases provide valuable insights into the application of integrative models, demonstrating how psychological and paranormal factors might interact in complex ways. One of the most famous cases, the Enfield poltergeist, took place in the 1970s in England and involved a family experiencing a wide range of disturbances, including furniture moving, unexplained noises, and apparitions (Playfair, 2011). Psychological explanations centered on the emotional instability of the family, particularly the adolescent girls, who were suspected of either fabricating the events or unconsciously manifesting the disturbances through stress. However, paranormal investigators observed phenomena that seemed to defy psychological explanations, such as the levitation of objects and the movement of heavy furniture, which led to the suggestion that psychokinesis or spirit entities might be involved (Rogo, 2019).
The Rosenheim poltergeist case, which occurred in a law office in Germany in the 1960s, is another example where an integrative approach is useful. The case involved electrical malfunctions, unexplained phone calls, and the movement of objects, all of which seemed to center around a young office worker (Gauld & Cornell, 2017). Psychological investigations pointed to the worker’s stress and dissatisfaction with her job as possible triggers for the events, aligning with psychodynamic theories of repressed emotions manifesting as physical disturbances. However, paranormal investigators noted that some of the phenomena, such as electrical failures, were difficult to explain through psychological means alone. The integration of psychological stress with the possibility of PK allowed researchers to explore the case from multiple angles, without dismissing either explanation prematurely (Playfair, 2011).
The case of Tina Resch in Columbus, Ohio, in the 1980s also demonstrates the potential for an integrative approach. Tina, a teenage girl, was reportedly at the center of poltergeist phenomena involving the movement of objects, including chairs and telephones, without any apparent physical cause (Roll, 2015). Psychological evaluations suggested that Tina’s troubled upbringing, marked by abandonment and emotional distress, could have played a role in the disturbances. However, some investigators argued that the nature of the phenomena, including the precise and violent movements of objects, pointed to psychokinetic abilities rather than purely psychological factors. The integration of psychological and paranormal theories provided a more nuanced interpretation of the case, acknowledging both Tina’s emotional state and the possibility of paranormal forces.
In contrast, some poltergeist cases ultimately reveal natural or psychological explanations despite initial suggestions of paranormal activity. For example, the Bell Witch case, which occurred in Tennessee in the early 19th century, involved a series of disturbances attributed to a spirit that allegedly tormented the Bell family (Nickell, 2014). While initially interpreted as a supernatural event, later investigations suggested that the phenomena could have been the result of family dynamics, including possible psychological manipulation and suggestibility. In this case, an integrative approach highlights the importance of considering psychological explanations alongside cultural and historical factors that contributed to the supernatural interpretation of the events.
Skeptical and Scientific Critiques of Integrative Models
While integrative approaches offer a broad framework for understanding poltergeist phenomena, they have been subject to criticism, particularly from skeptics and scientists who advocate for more rigorous empirical investigation. One common critique is that by combining psychological and paranormal explanations, integrative models may inadvertently blur the lines between natural and supernatural phenomena, making it difficult to test these theories scientifically (Nickell, 2014). Skeptics argue that psychological factors, such as cognitive biases and environmental stressors, are sufficient to explain most poltergeist cases, and that the inclusion of paranormal explanations introduces unnecessary metaphysical assumptions that cannot be empirically validated.
Furthermore, scientific investigations into poltergeist phenomena often reveal natural explanations that were overlooked in early reports. For example, some cases attributed to PK or spirits have been found to involve environmental factors, such as drafts, faulty wiring, or structural issues in buildings, which were initially misinterpreted as supernatural disturbances (Radin, 2018). Critics argue that these natural explanations are often dismissed or underplayed in integrative models, which may overemphasize the paranormal aspects of the phenomena. By focusing on psychological explanations grounded in empirical research, skeptics suggest that poltergeist cases can be better understood without resorting to paranormal theories.
Additionally, the challenges of conducting controlled scientific experiments on poltergeist activity make it difficult to validate paranormal explanations. Since poltergeist phenomena are typically spontaneous and unpredictable, replicating these events in a laboratory setting has proven to be a significant obstacle for researchers (Irwin, 2014). As a result, the evidence supporting paranormal explanations often relies on anecdotal reports and case studies, which lack the methodological rigor required by scientific standards. Critics contend that without more robust experimental evidence, paranormal explanations for poltergeist activity remain speculative at best.
Despite these critiques, proponents of integrative approaches argue that dismissing paranormal explanations outright overlooks the complexity of poltergeist cases. They contend that while psychological factors are undoubtedly significant, some cases exhibit characteristics that are difficult to explain through natural means alone (Rogo, 2019). By maintaining an open yet critical perspective, integrative models allow researchers to explore the full range of possibilities in poltergeist phenomena, without prematurely excluding either psychological or paranormal explanations.
Ethical Considerations in Poltergeist Investigations
Investigating poltergeist phenomena presents a range of ethical challenges, particularly when the individuals involved are vulnerable populations, such as children or those with psychological disorders. One of the primary ethical concerns is the potential harm that could result from attributing psychological issues to paranormal forces. In cases where poltergeist activity is reported, there is often significant emotional distress experienced by the individuals involved, which may stem from underlying psychological conditions, such as anxiety, trauma, or dissociation (Carr, 2014). If these conditions are misinterpreted as supernatural events, there is a risk that the individuals may not receive appropriate psychological care, thereby exacerbating their distress.
Ethical guidelines for investigating poltergeist cases emphasize the importance of considering psychological explanations first, particularly in cases involving minors or individuals with mental health issues. Investigators are encouraged to collaborate with mental health professionals to ensure that any underlying psychological issues are properly addressed before pursuing paranormal explanations (Lange & Houran, 2011). This approach helps protect vulnerable individuals from potential harm and ensures that they receive the care they need. Moreover, investigators should be cautious in their communication with the affected individuals, avoiding language that might reinforce beliefs in harmful or fear-inducing supernatural forces.
Another ethical concern relates to the potential for exploitation in poltergeist investigations. The sensational nature of poltergeist cases can attract significant media attention, which may lead to the exploitation of the individuals involved, particularly when cases are publicized before thorough investigations have been conducted. Investigators must ensure that they prioritize the well-being and privacy of the individuals affected by the phenomena, rather than seeking media attention or financial gain from the case (Nickell, 2014). Ethical guidelines recommend that researchers obtain informed consent from all individuals involved and respect their autonomy throughout the investigation process.
Finally, investigators must consider the broader social and cultural implications of their work. In cases where poltergeist activity is linked to cultural beliefs or practices, investigators should approach the case with sensitivity and respect for the cultural context in which the phenomena occur (Irwin, 2014). This includes recognizing that cultural beliefs in spirits or the supernatural may be deeply ingrained and that dismissing these beliefs outright could be harmful to the individuals involved. Ethical investigations should balance the need for scientific inquiry with respect for cultural diversity and individual belief systems.
Conclusion
Poltergeist phenomena, whether approached from psychological or paranormal perspectives, continue to challenge researchers across disciplines due to their elusive and often contradictory nature. Psychological explanations, which focus on cognitive biases, perceptual errors, and psychodynamic processes, provide valuable insights into how individuals may project internal conflicts or stressors onto external events. These theories are supported by numerous case studies where poltergeist activity is linked to repressed emotions, particularly in adolescents undergoing significant psychological turmoil (Carr, 2014). However, psychological models alone often fail to account for the full range of phenomena reported in poltergeist cases, leaving room for alternative explanations.
On the other hand, paranormal explanations, including psychokinesis and the involvement of spirits or entities, offer a different perspective on poltergeist activity. Parapsychological theories suggest that certain individuals may unconsciously manifest psychokinetic abilities, leading to the physical disturbances associated with poltergeist cases (Radin, 2018). Additionally, the spirit hypothesis remains popular in both folklore and paranormal research, with many cases interpreted as the actions of discarnate entities seeking resolution. While these explanations are compelling for those who believe in the paranormal, they often lack the empirical support required for widespread scientific acceptance (Nickell, 2014). Nevertheless, the persistence of these phenomena in various cultural and historical contexts suggests that poltergeist experiences cannot be easily dismissed.
An integrative approach that combines psychological, paranormal, and sociocultural factors may offer the most comprehensive framework for understanding poltergeist phenomena. By considering the potential interaction between psychological states and paranormal forces, researchers can explore a wider range of possibilities without prematurely excluding either explanation. Future research in transpersonal psychology and parapsychology should continue to investigate poltergeist phenomena using rigorous scientific methods while remaining open to the complexities of these experiences (Rogo, 2019). Ultimately, the study of poltergeist phenomena provides a unique window into the intersection of mind, culture, and the unknown, offering valuable insights into human consciousness and its potential beyond conventional understanding.
Bibliography
- Carr, B. (2014). Adolescence and poltergeist phenomena: A psychodynamic approach. Journal of Parapsychology, 78(2), 145-160.
- Fodor, N. (2012). Encyclopaedia of psychic science. Gale Research Company.
- Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id. Norton & Company.
- Gauld, A., & Cornell, A. D. (2017). Poltergeists: A study in destructive haunting. Routledge.
- Irwin, H. J. (2014). An introduction to parapsychology (5th ed.). McFarland & Company, Inc.
- Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2011). The role of suggestion and cognitive-perceptual personality traits in the formation of paranormal experiences: Development of a model. The Journal of Parapsychology, 65(2), 215-246.
- Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361-366.
- Nickell, J. (2014). The science of ghosts: Searching for spirits of the dead. Prometheus Books.
- Playfair, G. L. (2011). This house is haunted: The true story of a poltergeist. White Crow Books.
- Radin, D. (2018). Real magic: Ancient wisdom, modern science, and a guide to the secret power of the universe. Harmony.
- Rogo, D. S. (2019). The poltergeist experience: Investigations into ghostly manifestations. Helix Press.
- Roll, W. G. (2015). Unleashed: Of poltergeists and murder: The curious story of Tina Resch. Paraview Press.