Hypnosis in Accessing Paranormal Experiences

This article explores the role of hypnosis in accessing and investigating paranormal experiences, examining its historical context, mechanisms, and applications within transpersonal psychology. Hypnosis, a state of heightened suggestibility, has been employed to explore phenomena such as past-life regression, near-death experiences (NDEs), out-of-body experiences (OBEs), and extrasensory perception (ESP). By delving into the neurophysiological mechanisms of hypnosis and its ability to induce altered states of consciousness, the article also addresses the scientific skepticism and ethical concerns surrounding its use in paranormal research. This balanced overview highlights both the potential and limitations of hypnosis as a tool for accessing the transcendent and paranormal, offering insights into future research directions.

Introduction

Hypnosis, a psychological technique that induces a heightened state of suggestibility and focused attention, has long been associated with both therapeutic practices and explorations of consciousness. Historically, hypnosis was often linked with mysticism and spiritual practices, but over time, it has become recognized as a valuable tool in the psychological and medical fields. Hypnosis has been widely used to manage pain, treat trauma, and explore deep levels of consciousness (Lynn, Laurence, & Kirsch, 2015). Within the field of transpersonal psychology, hypnosis has garnered attention for its potential to access altered states of consciousness, which some claim can lead to paranormal experiences such as out-of-body experiences (OBEs), extrasensory perception (ESP), and past-life memories (Winkelman, 2017). The relationship between hypnosis and the paranormal offers a compelling area for exploration, particularly in understanding how altered states of consciousness may provide a gateway to phenomena that transcend ordinary sensory experience.

One of the central questions surrounding hypnosis and paranormal experiences is whether hypnosis truly enables access to dimensions beyond ordinary reality or if the experiences reported under hypnosis are psychological constructs influenced by suggestion and belief. Research in this area remains divided, with some scholars and practitioners asserting that hypnosis can facilitate genuine encounters with paranormal phenomena, while others argue that these experiences are the result of the mind’s suggestibility and the creation of vivid, yet subjective, experiences (Cardeña, 2018). Despite the controversy, hypnosis continues to be used in both scientific and therapeutic settings to explore topics that transcend the boundaries of normal perception, making it a focal point of inquiry in both transpersonal psychology and parapsychology.

This article will examine the various roles hypnosis plays in accessing paranormal experiences, with a particular focus on its historical development, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying hypnotic states, and specific paranormal phenomena explored through hypnosis, such as past-life regression and extrasensory perception. Furthermore, it will consider the criticisms and skepticism surrounding the use of hypnosis for paranormal research, providing a balanced view of its potential and limitations. By bridging the scientific study of hypnosis with the subjective accounts of paranormal experiences, this article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how hypnosis can be both a tool for exploration and a subject of ongoing debate in the field of transpersonal psychology.

Historical Perspectives on Hypnosis and Paranormal Phenomena

The historical connection between hypnosis and paranormal phenomena dates back to the late 18th century, when Franz Anton Mesmer developed the theory of “animal magnetism.” Mesmer believed that a natural force, which he termed magnetism, could be manipulated to influence the human body and mind, leading to both physical healing and altered states of consciousness (Pintar & Lynn, 2008). Mesmer’s techniques, later termed “mesmerism,” became foundational for the development of modern hypnosis. His work also sparked an interest in the exploration of psychic phenomena, with many early mesmerists reporting encounters with paranormal experiences such as clairvoyance, telepathy, and communication with spirits (Crabtree, 1993). Although animal magnetism was eventually discredited, the link between hypnotic states and the paranormal endured, laying the groundwork for future investigations.

In the 19th century, James Braid formalized hypnosis as a scientific discipline, coining the term “hypnosis” and shifting the focus from mystical explanations to psychological ones. However, even within the scientific context, the connection between hypnosis and the paranormal persisted. The rise of spiritualism in the mid-19th century saw mediums and spiritualists frequently employing hypnotic techniques to enter trance states, during which they claimed to communicate with the dead or access hidden knowledge (Gauld, 1992). While Braid distanced himself from these practices, other researchers, such as Pierre Janet and later Carl Jung, remained open to the idea that hypnosis could reveal aspects of consciousness linked to the transcendent or paranormal realms (Ellenberger, 1970). These early explorations set the stage for hypnosis to be a tool not only for therapeutic purposes but also for investigating phenomena beyond the scope of conventional psychology.

Throughout the 20th century, hypnosis continued to be used in the study of paranormal phenomena, particularly within the context of past-life regression and psychic research. Parapsychologists such as J. B. Rhine and Ian Stevenson conducted studies on extrasensory perception (ESP) and reincarnation, often utilizing hypnosis as a means of accessing these phenomena (Stevenson, 1987). Hypnotic regression, in particular, became a popular method for individuals to recall alleged past-life memories or other paranormal experiences. However, the scientific validity of these claims has been heavily debated, with skeptics attributing the experiences to the power of suggestion, memory distortion, or the influence of pre-existing beliefs (Lynn et al., 2015). Despite the controversy, hypnosis remains a tool of interest for researchers and practitioners exploring the boundaries of human consciousness and the possibility of accessing paranormal realms.

Mechanisms of Hypnosis in Facilitating Paranormal Experiences

Hypnosis, as a state of altered consciousness, is believed to facilitate paranormal experiences through several neurophysiological and psychological mechanisms. When individuals enter a hypnotic trance, brainwave activity shifts from the usual beta waves associated with normal waking consciousness to alpha and theta waves, which are linked to deep relaxation and meditative states (Rainville et al., 2002). These brainwave patterns are similar to those observed in other altered states of consciousness, such as meditation or near-death experiences (NDEs), which are often associated with paranormal phenomena. The shift in brainwave activity during hypnosis may help individuals access unconscious material or transcend ordinary sensory experiences, creating a mental environment conducive to the perception of paranormal phenomena like extrasensory perception (ESP), past-life memories, or out-of-body experiences (OBEs).

Another key mechanism by which hypnosis facilitates paranormal experiences is the role of heightened suggestibility. Hypnosis is characterized by an increased receptivity to suggestion, meaning that individuals in a hypnotic state are more likely to accept and internalize ideas or images presented to them (Lynn et al., 2015). This heightened suggestibility can lead to the creation of vivid mental imagery or experiences that feel real to the individual, even if they are constructed by the mind. For instance, in the context of past-life regression, a hypnotic suggestion that the individual is accessing memories from a previous incarnation can result in detailed recollections of past lives, which the person may interpret as authentic experiences (Nash, 2012). While these experiences can be deeply meaningful for the individual, they are often viewed by skeptics as products of suggestion rather than evidence of paranormal realities.

The dissociative effects of hypnosis also play a role in its ability to facilitate paranormal experiences. Dissociation refers to a psychological state in which an individual becomes detached from their usual sense of self or reality, allowing them to access different layers of consciousness or memory (Cardeña, 2009). Under hypnosis, individuals may experience a form of dissociation that enables them to explore experiences outside of their ordinary awareness, such as OBEs or contact with non-physical entities. Some researchers suggest that dissociation under hypnosis can simulate paranormal phenomena, as the mind temporarily suspends the usual boundaries between conscious and unconscious processing (Woody & Sadler, 2008). This state of dissociation allows individuals to experience alternate realities or dimensions of consciousness that are interpreted as paranormal.

Additionally, hypnosis has been used to enhance psychic abilities such as ESP and telepathy. Research conducted by parapsychologists has explored whether hypnosis can heighten an individual’s sensitivity to psychic phenomena by reducing mental noise and distractions that usually interfere with these subtle perceptions (Braud, 2003). For example, in studies where subjects were hypnotized and asked to engage in telepathic communication or remote viewing, some reported successful transmission of information beyond the limits of ordinary sensory perception. However, the results of such studies remain controversial, with critics arguing that the experiences could be attributed to cognitive biases or the influence of expectation (Lynn et al., 2015). Despite these criticisms, hypnosis continues to be used as a tool for exploring psychic abilities, and its mechanisms in facilitating paranormal experiences remain a subject of interest within transpersonal psychology.

Hypnotic Regression and Paranormal Recall

Hypnotic regression is a technique in which an individual, while under hypnosis, is guided to mentally revisit past experiences. This practice has been popularized as a means of recovering forgotten memories, exploring childhood traumas, or, more controversially, accessing memories from previous lifetimes. Within the realm of paranormal phenomena, hypnotic regression has gained attention for its purported ability to enable individuals to recall experiences of a paranormal nature, such as past-life memories, extraterrestrial encounters, and spirit communications. Advocates of hypnotic regression claim that it provides a unique method for exploring the non-ordinary dimensions of human consciousness, allowing individuals to access memories and experiences that transcend the limitations of their current life (Newton, 2004). However, the authenticity of these experiences is hotly debated, with critics questioning the reliability of the memories retrieved during hypnosis.

One of the most widely discussed applications of hypnotic regression in paranormal recall is past-life regression. Proponents of past-life regression therapy, such as psychiatrist Ian Stevenson, argue that hypnosis can enable individuals to access memories from previous incarnations, offering insights into unresolved issues, fears, or relationships that may carry over into their current life (Stevenson, 1987). In a typical past-life regression session, the hypnotist guides the subject into a deep trance and suggests that they travel back in time to a previous life. Many individuals report vivid experiences, describing specific details of past environments, historical events, or personal experiences that seem far removed from their current reality (Weiss, 1992). While these accounts can be compelling, critics argue that such experiences may be influenced by suggestion, leading individuals to create imaginative but false memories.

The primary critique of hypnotic regression and paranormal recall is the high susceptibility to suggestibility and memory distortion during hypnosis. Research has shown that individuals in a hypnotic state are more prone to confabulation, a process by which the mind fills in gaps in memory with fabricated details that feel real to the individual (Nash, 2012). In the context of paranormal recall, this means that an individual under hypnosis may create false memories of past lives or paranormal experiences, influenced by the expectations set by the hypnotist or the individual’s prior beliefs about the paranormal. Studies on memory have demonstrated that hypnotic subjects can develop false memories of events that never occurred, raising concerns about the reliability of memories retrieved through hypnotic regression (Lynn et al., 2015). Thus, while the experiences may feel authentic to the individual, they may not provide verifiable evidence of paranormal phenomena.

Despite these concerns, some researchers continue to explore the use of hypnotic regression in investigating paranormal experiences. For example, cases of alleged alien abduction often involve individuals recalling their encounters through hypnotic regression. The use of hypnosis in these cases is controversial, as many of the details recalled during regression are inconsistent or lack corroborative evidence (McNally & Clancy, 2005). However, the experiences of these individuals are often deeply emotional and impactful, leading some researchers to suggest that even if the memories are not factual, they may represent a form of psychological truth or symbolic meaning for the individual. This raises important questions about the nature of memory, consciousness, and the paranormal: even if the experiences are not “real” in a literal sense, they may hold significant meaning for the person who experiences them.

Ethical considerations also play a critical role in the practice of hypnotic regression, especially when used to explore paranormal recall. Hypnosis can create powerful emotional responses, and individuals who undergo regression may become deeply invested in the belief that the experiences they recall are true. This can lead to psychological distress or confusion, particularly if the memories involve trauma or unresolved issues from supposed past lives or paranormal encounters (Baker, 1992). As such, it is essential for practitioners to approach hypnotic regression with caution, ensuring that clients are fully informed about the potential risks and limitations of the technique. Additionally, there is a need for further research to better understand the mechanisms underlying hypnotic regression and the extent to which it can reliably access paranormal experiences without inducing false memories.

Hypnosis in Investigating Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences

Hypnosis has long been used as a tool to investigate near-death experiences (NDEs) and out-of-body experiences (OBEs), both of which are considered significant in the realm of paranormal phenomena. NDEs are typically reported by individuals who have had close encounters with death, often describing sensations such as leaving the body, entering a tunnel of light, or encountering spiritual beings. OBEs, on the other hand, involve the sensation of detaching from one’s physical body and observing it from an external perspective, without necessarily being in a life-threatening situation (Alvarado, 2000). Hypnosis is utilized in these investigations to induce states of consciousness that mimic or recall these experiences, allowing researchers and therapists to explore the subjective aspects of NDEs and OBEs in a controlled environment. Through hypnotic techniques, individuals can be guided to re-experience or simulate these states, offering insights into their psychological and physiological underpinnings.

Hypnotic regression has been particularly useful in retrieving memories of near-death experiences. Since NDEs often occur during traumatic or life-threatening events, individuals may have difficulty recalling them clearly. Hypnosis allows individuals to re-enter the altered state they experienced during the NDE, often providing richer and more detailed accounts of their experiences (Greyson, 2000). These accounts commonly include descriptions of out-of-body experiences, encounters with deceased loved ones, and feelings of peace and transcendence. Proponents argue that hypnosis facilitates access to deep layers of consciousness where these memories are stored, potentially offering evidence of consciousness continuing beyond physical death. However, skeptics caution that the highly suggestible nature of hypnosis may lead individuals to embellish or even fabricate memories, especially if they have pre-existing beliefs or expectations about what an NDE entails (Lynn et al., 2015).

OBEs have also been explored extensively through hypnosis. Hypnosis can induce OBEs by guiding individuals to imagine leaving their bodies and floating above themselves, often with vivid sensory detail. Research in this area has focused on whether hypnosis can trigger genuine OBEs or simply vivid mental simulations of the experience. Studies conducted in controlled environments have shown that hypnosis can induce OBE-like sensations in individuals, but these are typically understood as altered perceptions rather than actual separations from the body (Blackmore, 2010). Nevertheless, individuals who undergo hypnosis and experience OBEs often report the sensation of being disconnected from their physical body, raising questions about the boundaries between subjective experience and objective reality. Some researchers suggest that OBEs induced through hypnosis may be useful for understanding the mechanics of consciousness and how it can operate outside the usual constraints of the body.

A significant aspect of using hypnosis to investigate OBEs and NDEs is the neurophysiological response during these experiences. Hypnosis, like meditation and other altered states of consciousness, induces changes in brain activity, particularly in areas related to sensory processing, memory, and self-awareness (Rainville et al., 2002). These changes may mirror the neurological shifts that occur during spontaneous OBEs and NDEs, suggesting that hypnosis can simulate the conditions under which these experiences naturally occur. However, despite the ability to reproduce some of the sensations associated with OBEs and NDEs, there is no conclusive evidence that hypnosis can replicate the full depth of these experiences as they happen in real life. This has led to ongoing debates about whether the states accessed through hypnosis are genuine representations of paranormal phenomena or simply imaginative recreations.

Finally, the therapeutic implications of using hypnosis to investigate NDEs and OBEs are significant. Individuals who have had NDEs or OBEs often struggle to integrate these profound experiences into their daily lives, sometimes experiencing confusion, existential crises, or heightened sensitivity to spiritual matters. Hypnosis can help individuals process these experiences in a safe and structured way, allowing them to explore the emotions and insights associated with their NDEs or OBEs (Greyson, 2000). By re-experiencing these states under hypnosis, individuals may gain greater clarity and understanding, leading to personal growth and psychological healing. At the same time, it is crucial for therapists to remain mindful of the suggestive nature of hypnosis, ensuring that the process does not inadvertently lead to false memories or distorted perceptions of the experience.

Hypnosis and Extrasensory Perception (ESP)

Extrasensory perception (ESP) refers to the ability to acquire information beyond the use of the five traditional senses. Common types of ESP include telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and psychokinesis. Researchers in parapsychology have long been interested in the potential for hypnosis to enhance ESP abilities, as hypnosis is known to increase suggestibility, reduce cognitive distractions, and induce altered states of consciousness, all of which are thought to facilitate paranormal abilities (Krippner, 2010). By inducing a heightened state of focus and concentration, hypnosis has been hypothesized to allow individuals to tap into latent psychic abilities, potentially enhancing their sensitivity to subtle information that would otherwise be beyond their conscious awareness.

A number of studies have attempted to explore the relationship between hypnosis and ESP, often with mixed results. In early parapsychological experiments, researchers such as J. B. Rhine investigated whether individuals in a hypnotic state would perform better on tasks requiring ESP, such as guessing the identity of hidden objects or predicting the outcomes of random events (Rhine, 1975). Some studies reported modest improvements in ESP abilities under hypnosis compared to waking consciousness, leading to the suggestion that hypnosis might reduce mental “noise” and enhance the clarity of psychic impressions (Braud, 2003). However, the results of these studies have been difficult to replicate consistently, raising questions about the reliability and scientific validity of the findings.

One explanation for the inconsistent results in hypnosis-ESP research is the role of expectancy and suggestibility. Hypnosis is characterized by a heightened responsiveness to suggestion, meaning that individuals who believe they have psychic abilities or who are told they will perform well in ESP tasks may experience a placebo-like effect (Lynn et al., 2015). This raises the possibility that the apparent enhancement of ESP abilities under hypnosis may be more attributable to the power of suggestion than to any real expansion of psychic perception. For example, if a subject under hypnosis is told that they will be able to telepathically communicate with another person, they may unconsciously generate mental images or impressions based on expectation rather than actual telepathic communication (Wiseman & Greening, 2002). Thus, suggestibility plays a significant role in shaping the outcomes of hypnosis-based ESP experiments.

Moreover, the neurophysiological mechanisms of hypnosis may not be fully conducive to enhancing ESP. While hypnosis induces brainwave patterns associated with relaxation and deep concentration, such as alpha and theta waves, these same brain states are also associated with reduced external awareness and heightened internal focus (Rainville et al., 2002). This inward-focused state may make it more difficult for individuals to perceive external stimuli, particularly those that might be considered extrasensory in nature. Therefore, while hypnosis can foster vivid internal experiences, it may not necessarily improve an individual’s ability to perceive information beyond the normal sensory channels. This has led some researchers to suggest that the apparent connection between hypnosis and ESP is more psychological than paranormal, driven by expectation and imagination.

Despite the skepticism, hypnosis remains an area of interest in parapsychology for exploring the potential of ESP. Hypnotic induction is frequently used in experiments with individuals who claim to have psychic abilities, as it can help facilitate a relaxed and focused state conducive to exploring the limits of consciousness. However, the scientific community remains divided on whether hypnosis genuinely enhances ESP abilities or if the experiences reported under hypnosis are the result of suggestion, placebo effects, or cognitive biases (Radin, 2006). Future research will need to address these concerns with more rigorous methodologies, including controls for suggestion and expectancy, in order to determine whether hypnosis can indeed unlock the potential for extrasensory perception.

Skepticism and Criticisms of Hypnosis in Paranormal Research

The use of hypnosis in paranormal research has been met with significant skepticism from the scientific community, largely due to concerns regarding the reliability and validity of the experiences reported under hypnosis. One of the primary criticisms is that hypnosis, by its nature, induces a heightened state of suggestibility, which can lead to the creation of false memories and distorted perceptions. This phenomenon, known as confabulation, occurs when the mind fills in gaps in memory with imagined or altered details, making it difficult to distinguish between genuine experiences and those shaped by suggestion (Lynn et al., 2015). In paranormal research, this issue is particularly problematic, as individuals under hypnosis may report vivid but unverifiable experiences, such as past-life memories or encounters with supernatural entities, which cannot be corroborated through external evidence.

Skeptics also argue that many of the paranormal experiences accessed through hypnosis are influenced by pre-existing beliefs and cultural expectations. For example, individuals who believe in reincarnation are more likely to report past-life memories during hypnotic regression, while those who believe in alien abductions may recall extraterrestrial encounters (Baker, 1992). This raises the question of whether hypnosis is genuinely accessing hidden aspects of the unconscious mind or simply amplifying the individual’s expectations and beliefs. Studies have shown that suggestibility plays a significant role in shaping the content of experiences recalled under hypnosis, with individuals often incorporating elements from popular culture or personal belief systems into their narratives (Spanos, 1996). As a result, many researchers caution against interpreting hypnotic experiences as evidence of paranormal phenomena without considering the powerful influence of suggestion.

Another point of criticism is the lack of consistent and replicable results in hypnosis-based paranormal research. While some studies have reported positive findings, such as enhanced extrasensory perception (ESP) or detailed past-life memories, these results have often been difficult to reproduce under controlled conditions (Wiseman, 2011). In scientific research, the ability to replicate findings is essential for establishing the credibility of a hypothesis. The inconsistent outcomes in hypnosis-based paranormal research have led many scientists to question whether the effects observed are genuine or merely the result of experimental bias, flawed methodologies, or chance (Irwin & Watt, 2007). Furthermore, the reliance on subjective reports from hypnotized individuals, rather than objective measures, makes it challenging to verify the authenticity of the experiences being studied.

In addition to concerns about suggestibility and replication, critics also point to the ethical challenges associated with using hypnosis in paranormal research. Hypnosis can create intense emotional experiences, and individuals may become deeply invested in the belief that the memories or paranormal encounters they recall under hypnosis are real. This can lead to psychological distress, particularly if the experiences involve trauma or unresolved conflicts from alleged past lives or encounters with supernatural entities (Baker, 1992). Moreover, there is a risk that unscrupulous practitioners may exploit individuals’ beliefs for personal gain, reinforcing false memories or paranormal narratives for financial or reputational purposes. These ethical concerns highlight the need for rigorous guidelines and informed consent when using hypnosis in any form of research, particularly when exploring controversial topics such as the paranormal.

The psychological community has also raised questions about the mechanisms underlying the experiences reported under hypnosis. Research into memory and cognition suggests that hypnosis may alter normal cognitive processes, leading individuals to create more vivid and elaborate narratives than they would in a waking state (Nash, 2012). The nature of these narratives, particularly in paranormal contexts, often reflects the individual’s imagination, desires, or fears. From a cognitive psychology perspective, the vividness and emotional intensity of these experiences may give them a false sense of authenticity, even though they are products of the mind rather than external reality. This has led many scientists to view hypnosis as a tool for exploring subjective experience rather than a reliable method for investigating objective paranormal phenomena.

Despite these criticisms, some researchers continue to explore the potential of hypnosis in paranormal research, arguing that even if the experiences are not “real” in an objective sense, they may provide valuable insights into human consciousness and belief systems. Hypnosis can reveal how individuals process and integrate extraordinary experiences, offering a window into the psychological mechanisms that underlie belief in the paranormal (Krippner, 2010). Furthermore, the therapeutic use of hypnosis in addressing paranormal experiences, such as past-life regression therapy, continues to attract interest in the fields of transpersonal psychology and spiritual healing. While skepticism remains high, the study of hypnosis in paranormal contexts highlights the complex interplay between mind, belief, and experience, suggesting that there is still much to learn about the nature of human consciousness and its capacity for extraordinary perceptions.

Conclusion

The exploration of hypnosis as a tool for accessing paranormal experiences presents both intriguing possibilities and significant challenges. Throughout its history, hypnosis has been associated with phenomena such as past-life regression, out-of-body experiences (OBEs), and extrasensory perception (ESP). Proponents of hypnosis in paranormal research argue that it enables individuals to access altered states of consciousness, opening the door to experiences that transcend the limits of ordinary perception (Krippner, 2010). Hypnosis may create conditions conducive to the exploration of hidden memories and extraordinary experiences, offering valuable insights into the nature of human consciousness and its potential for accessing dimensions beyond the physical world. However, the subjective nature of these experiences, combined with the highly suggestible state induced by hypnosis, makes it difficult to distinguish between genuine paranormal phenomena and the effects of imagination, expectation, or suggestion.

Despite the allure of using hypnosis to investigate the paranormal, substantial skepticism remains. Critics point out the risk of memory distortion and confabulation during hypnosis, particularly when exploring topics such as past lives or encounters with supernatural entities (Lynn et al., 2015). The lack of consistent and replicable results in hypnosis-based paranormal research has further fueled doubts about its efficacy as a scientific method. While some studies have reported positive findings in areas like ESP and paranormal recall, these results have often been difficult to reproduce under controlled conditions, raising questions about their validity (Wiseman, 2011). Additionally, ethical concerns regarding the potential psychological risks of hypnotic regression and paranormal recall underscore the need for caution when using hypnosis in this context.

In conclusion, hypnosis remains a fascinating yet contentious tool in the study of paranormal experiences. While it offers the potential to explore extraordinary dimensions of consciousness and belief, its limitations in terms of reliability and scientific rigor cannot be overlooked. Hypnosis provides a means of accessing profound subjective experiences, but the interpretation of these experiences as evidence of the paranormal remains controversial. Future research in this area will need to employ more rigorous methodologies, with careful attention to the role of suggestion and expectancy, in order to determine whether hypnosis can genuinely unlock new insights into the nature of paranormal phenomena (Radin, 2006). Until then, hypnosis remains a valuable tool for exploring the mysteries of the mind, even if its role in accessing paranormal realms remains uncertain.

Bibliography

1. Alvarado, C. S. (2000). Out-of-body experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (pp. 183-218). American Psychological Association.
2. Baker, R. A. (1992). Hidden memories: Voices and visions from within. Prometheus Books.
3. Baker, R. A. (1992). Hidden memories: Voices and visions from within. Prometheus Books.
4. Blackmore, S. (2010). Seeing myself: The new science of out-of-body experiences. Robinson.
5. Braud, W. (2003). Distant mental influence: Its contributions to science, healing, and human interactions. Hampton Roads Publishing.
6. Cardeña, E. (2009). Dissociation in hypnosis and culture: Implications for understanding altered states. Contemporary Hypnosis, 26(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ch.373
7. Cardeña, E. (2018). The altered states database: Psychometric data on altered states of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001
8. Crabtree, A. (1993). From Mesmer to Freud: Magnetic sleep and the roots of psychological healing. Yale University Press.
9. Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. Basic Books.
10. Gauld, A. (1992). A history of hypnotism. Cambridge University Press.
11. Greyson, B. (2000). Near-death experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (pp. 315-352). American Psychological Association.
12. Irwin, H. J., & Watt, C. A. (2007). An introduction to parapsychology (5th ed.). McFarland & Company.
13. Krippner, S. (2010). Hypnosis and ESP: The role of altered states of consciousness in psi phenomena. Journal of Parapsychology, 74(1), 67-92.
14. Lynn, S. J., Laurence, J. R., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), 314-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.976786
15. McNally, R. J., & Clancy, S. A. (2005). Sleep paralysis, sexual abuse, and space alien abduction. Transcultural Psychiatry, 42(1), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461505050715
16. Nash, M. R. (2012). The truth and the hype of hypnosis. Scientific American, 306(2), 64-69.
17. Newton, M. (2004). Journey of souls: Case studies of life between lives. Llewellyn Publications.
18. Pintar, J., & Lynn, S. J. (2008). Hypnosis: A brief history. Wiley-Blackwell.
19. Radin, D. (2006). Entangled minds: Extrasensory experiences in a quantum reality. Paraview Pocket Books.
20. Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Bushnell, M. C., Duncan, G. H., & Price, D. D. (2002). Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 887-901. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902760191117
21. Rhine, J. B. (1975). Extrasensory perception. Boston Society for Psychical Research.
22. Spanos, N. P. (1996). Multiple identities and false memories: A sociocognitive perspective. American Psychological Association.
23. Stevenson, I. (1987). Children who remember previous lives: A question of reincarnation. University of Virginia Press.
24. Weiss, B. (1992). Many lives, many masters: The true story of a prominent psychiatrist, his young patient, and the past-life therapy that changed both their lives. Simon and Schuster.
25. Winkelman, M. (2017). Altered states of consciousness and hypnosis in anthropology. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 49(2), 113-132.
26. Wiseman, R. (2011). Paranormality: Why we see what isn’t there. Macmillan.
27. Wiseman, R., & Greening, E. (2002). Belief in the paranormal and suggestibility: An experimental approach. The Skeptic Inquiry Press.
28. Woody, E. Z., & Sadler, P. (2008). Dissociation theories of hypnosis. In M. R. Nash & A. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 81-110). Oxford University Press.