Integrating Science and Spirituality in Integral Psychology

This article explores the integration of science and spirituality within the framework of integral psychology, a discipline that seeks to understand human experience through a holistic lens. It examines the historical context and theoretical foundations of integral psychology, highlighting key figures and the evolution of psychological thought. The intersection of scientific inquiry and spiritual traditions is analyzed, showcasing research that demonstrates the psychological benefits of spiritual practices and the contributions of spirituality to scientific understanding. Methodological approaches, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research, are discussed to illustrate how these integrative practices can be applied in clinical, educational, and community settings. The article addresses challenges and critiques surrounding the integration of science and spirituality, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations and empirical evidence. Ultimately, it advocates for the importance of an integrative approach in fostering holistic well-being and advancing the future of psychology.

Introduction

The relationship between science and spirituality has long been a subject of debate within the field of psychology. As the discipline has evolved, a growing recognition of the importance of integrating these domains has emerged, particularly through the lens of integral psychology. Integral psychology is characterized by its holistic approach, emphasizing the interconnectedness of mind, body, and spirit (Wilber, 2000). This integration not only provides a more comprehensive understanding of human experience but also promotes the well-being of individuals by acknowledging the spiritual dimensions of life alongside psychological and physiological aspects (Rogers, 1999).

Historically, psychology has oscillated between empirical rigor and subjective experience. Traditional psychological paradigms often prioritized objective measures and observable behaviors, leading to a neglect of the subjective and spiritual dimensions of human existence (Jung, 1964). However, the rise of transpersonal psychology in the late 20th century marked a significant shift in this paradigm, advocating for a more inclusive approach that encompasses spiritual experiences and personal transformation (Grof, 2000). Integral psychology builds upon this foundation, seeking to unify scientific inquiry and spiritual exploration to foster a deeper understanding of consciousness and human development.

Central to the discourse on integrating science and spirituality is the concept of consciousness itself. Consciousness has been variously defined across different disciplines, with scientific approaches often focusing on neurological and cognitive processes, while spiritual traditions emphasize experiential and transcendental aspects (Davis, 2012). This multifaceted nature of consciousness invites a comprehensive exploration that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, allowing for a richer understanding of human experiences (Tart, 1975). By examining the interplay between scientific and spiritual perspectives on consciousness, integral psychology offers a pathway for more inclusive and holistic approaches to mental health and well-being.

The practical implications of integrating science and spirituality within psychology are profound. Research has demonstrated the psychological benefits of various spiritual practices, such as meditation, mindfulness, and prayer, highlighting their role in enhancing emotional resilience, reducing anxiety, and fostering a sense of purpose (Benson et al., 1996; Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Moreover, the incorporation of spiritual perspectives in therapeutic settings has been shown to improve treatment outcomes and client satisfaction, underscoring the importance of addressing spiritual concerns within psychological practice (Pargament, 2007). Integral psychology thus advocates for the recognition of spirituality as a vital component of psychological health, promoting a more comprehensive approach to therapy and healing.

Despite the promising potential of integrating science and spirituality, challenges and critiques remain. Skepticism persists within the scientific community regarding the validity of spiritual practices and the need for empirical evidence to support their efficacy (Lange, 2012). Ethical considerations also arise in navigating the beliefs and values of clients in therapeutic settings, necessitating a careful balance between scientific rigor and spiritual sensitivity (Sperry, 2001). This article will delve into these challenges while exploring the theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and practical applications of integrating science and spirituality in integral psychology, ultimately advocating for a holistic approach that enhances the understanding and treatment of the human experience.

Theoretical Foundations of Integral Psychology

Integral psychology is rooted in a holistic framework that seeks to understand human consciousness by integrating various dimensions of experience, including psychological, physical, and spiritual aspects. This theoretical foundation draws from multiple sources, including Eastern and Western philosophical traditions, transpersonal psychology, and modern scientific insights. Central to the development of integral psychology is the work of Ken Wilber, who posited that human experience is multifaceted and should be analyzed through a lens that encompasses not only individual psychological processes but also broader cultural and spiritual contexts (Wilber, 2000). This integrative perspective enables a deeper understanding of the complexities of human nature and the interconnectedness of diverse experiences.

The historical context of integral psychology highlights its evolution from traditional psychological theories that often emphasized a reductionist approach. Early psychological frameworks, such as behaviorism and psychoanalysis, focused primarily on observable behaviors and unconscious motivations, often neglecting the spiritual dimension of human existence (Jung, 1964). The advent of transpersonal psychology in the late 20th century marked a pivotal shift, as it began to explore spiritual experiences and altered states of consciousness as legitimate areas of inquiry (Grof, 2000). Integral psychology builds upon this foundation, proposing a comprehensive model that incorporates both scientific rigor and spiritual insight, thus expanding the boundaries of psychological inquiry.

One of the core principles of integral psychology is the recognition of multiple dimensions of consciousness. Wilber (2000) introduced the concept of “quadrants,” which categorizes human experience into four distinct but interrelated dimensions: the individual interior (subjective), individual exterior (objective), collective interior (intersubjective), and collective exterior (interobjective). This framework allows for a nuanced exploration of how personal experiences are influenced by cultural and social contexts, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive understanding of psychological phenomena. By situating individual experiences within a broader context, integral psychology acknowledges the importance of relationships and collective consciousness in shaping psychological development.

Integral psychology also emphasizes the significance of developmental stages in understanding human growth and transformation. Wilber’s (2000) “developmental model” posits that individuals progress through various stages of consciousness, each characterized by distinct ways of knowing and experiencing the world. This model integrates insights from developmental psychology, spirituality, and cultural studies, offering a roadmap for personal and collective growth. Recognizing these stages allows practitioners to tailor therapeutic approaches to the unique needs of individuals at different points in their developmental journey, facilitating a more personalized and effective treatment process.

Finally, integral psychology highlights the importance of integrating scientific research with spiritual practices to foster holistic well-being. Research has demonstrated the psychological benefits of practices such as mindfulness, meditation, and yoga, which not only enhance emotional resilience but also promote spiritual growth (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Brown et al., 2007). By incorporating these practices into therapeutic settings, integral psychology provides a framework for addressing the spiritual dimensions of mental health, encouraging clients to explore their beliefs and experiences as part of their healing journey. This integrative approach ultimately underscores the importance of recognizing and honoring the diverse dimensions of human experience, paving the way for a more inclusive and holistic understanding of psychology.

The Intersection of Science and Spirituality

The intersection of science and spirituality represents a rich area of exploration within integral psychology, where empirical inquiry and subjective experience converge. Historically, these domains have often been seen as opposing forces, with science prioritizing objective measurements and spirituality emphasizing personal, subjective experiences (Holt, 1972). However, recent developments in psychology and neuroscience have begun to challenge this dichotomy, revealing that scientific approaches can indeed illuminate spiritual experiences and vice versa. By bridging the gap between these two realms, integral psychology provides a more comprehensive understanding of human consciousness and well-being.

Recent scientific research has demonstrated the psychological benefits associated with various spiritual practices, such as meditation, mindfulness, and prayer. For instance, studies have shown that mindfulness meditation can lead to reductions in anxiety, depression, and stress while promoting overall emotional well-being (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Goyal et al., 2014). Neuroscientific investigations have also revealed that regular meditation can alter brain structure and function, enhancing areas associated with emotional regulation, self-awareness, and cognitive flexibility (Davidson et al., 2003). These findings underscore the potential of integrating spiritual practices into psychological interventions, offering empirical support for the efficacy of approaches that honor both scientific and spiritual dimensions.

Conversely, spirituality can also provide valuable insights that inform scientific inquiry. Spiritual traditions often emphasize experiential knowledge and wisdom gained from altered states of consciousness, which can enhance understanding of consciousness itself (Tart, 1975). For example, mystical experiences reported across various spiritual traditions share common themes, such as feelings of unity, transcendence, and a deep sense of connection to a larger reality (Pahnke, 1969). By examining these experiences through a scientific lens, researchers can explore the underlying psychological and neurological processes that facilitate such states, fostering a dialogue between spiritual and scientific perspectives on consciousness.

Integral psychology posits that the integration of science and spirituality leads to a more holistic understanding of human experience. This approach recognizes that human beings are not solely rational entities but also possess emotional, intuitive, and spiritual dimensions (Wilber, 2000). By acknowledging and validating the spiritual aspects of human experience, integral psychology encourages a more inclusive framework for understanding mental health and well-being. This perspective aligns with the growing movement in psychology that emphasizes the importance of addressing spiritual concerns in therapeutic practice, enhancing the effectiveness of interventions by considering the whole person.

Despite the potential benefits of integrating science and spirituality, challenges remain. Skepticism persists within the scientific community regarding the validity and reliability of spiritual practices, often due to a lack of empirical evidence (Lange, 2012). Furthermore, ethical considerations arise when incorporating spirituality into psychological practice, necessitating careful navigation of clients’ beliefs and values (Sperry, 2001). Addressing these challenges is crucial for the successful integration of science and spirituality within integral psychology, paving the way for future research and practice that honors both empirical rigor and the richness of human spiritual experience.

Methodological Approaches in Integral Psychology

Integral psychology employs a variety of methodological approaches to explore the complex interplay between psychological and spiritual dimensions of human experience. Recognizing that human consciousness encompasses subjective, intersubjective, and objective aspects, integral psychology advocates for a pluralistic methodology that integrates both qualitative and quantitative research methods (Wilber, 2000). This multifaceted approach allows researchers and practitioners to gather a richer and more nuanced understanding of human experience, facilitating a comprehensive exploration of the psychological and spiritual realms.

Qualitative methods are particularly valuable in integral psychology, as they enable in-depth exploration of individual experiences and meanings. Phenomenological approaches, for example, focus on understanding the essence of lived experiences, emphasizing the subjective and personal aspects of consciousness (Van Manen, 1990). This method allows researchers to capture the richness of spiritual experiences and psychological processes, revealing insights that may not be readily accessible through quantitative measures. Additionally, interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) offers a framework for examining how individuals make sense of their spiritual and psychological experiences within their specific cultural contexts (Smith et al., 2009). By prioritizing the voice of the participant, qualitative methods align well with the principles of integral psychology, which emphasizes the importance of subjective experience.

Quantitative methods also play a crucial role in the research landscape of integral psychology. Various scales and assessments have been developed to measure constructs related to spirituality, well-being, and psychological functioning. For example, the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) assesses an individual’s spiritual well-being across dimensions such as existential and religious well-being (Paloutzian & Ellison, 1982). By employing standardized measures, researchers can quantitatively evaluate the relationships between spiritual practices, psychological outcomes, and overall well-being. These quantitative methods not only enhance the rigor of research findings but also facilitate the examination of spiritual constructs in a manner that is compatible with empirical standards.

The integration of mixed-methods research represents a significant advancement in the field of integral psychology. Mixed-methods approaches combine qualitative and quantitative methodologies, allowing for a comprehensive examination of complex phenomena (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011). This approach is particularly beneficial in studying the interplay between science and spirituality, as it enables researchers to triangulate findings from different methodologies to create a more holistic understanding. For instance, a mixed-methods study might employ quantitative measures to assess the impact of mindfulness meditation on psychological well-being while simultaneously conducting qualitative interviews to explore participants’ subjective experiences of spirituality during meditation. This integrative approach not only enriches the research findings but also enhances the applicability of the results to therapeutic practice.

Moreover, the methodological pluralism inherent in integral psychology encourages collaboration across disciplines, promoting interdisciplinary research that addresses the complexity of human experience. By engaging with fields such as neuroscience, anthropology, and religious studies, integral psychology can benefit from diverse perspectives and methodologies (Grof, 2000). This collaborative approach fosters a more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between psychological and spiritual dimensions, ultimately contributing to the advancement of both theory and practice in the field. As integral psychology continues to evolve, its methodological approaches will play a crucial role in facilitating deeper insights into the multifaceted nature of human consciousness and well-being.

Practical Applications of Integrating Science and Spirituality

Clinical Applications

The integration of science and spirituality in clinical psychology has significant implications for therapeutic practices. By recognizing the spiritual dimensions of clients’ experiences, therapists can create a more holistic treatment approach that addresses both psychological and spiritual needs (Sperry, 2001). For instance, incorporating mindfulness-based interventions, which combine psychological principles with spiritual practices, has been shown to enhance emotional regulation and overall well-being (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Such practices not only provide clients with coping strategies but also encourage self-exploration and personal growth, fostering a deeper connection to their spiritual beliefs and values.

Another practical application lies in the recognition of spirituality as a resource for resilience and coping during challenging life events. Research has demonstrated that individuals who engage in spiritual practices often report higher levels of psychological resilience and coping skills when facing stressors, such as illness or loss (Pargament, 2007). Therapists can support clients in identifying and leveraging their spiritual beliefs and practices to enhance their coping mechanisms, promoting a sense of meaning and purpose in their lives. This approach emphasizes the importance of individualized therapy that respects and incorporates clients’ spiritual backgrounds, leading to more effective therapeutic outcomes.

Furthermore, the integration of science and spirituality can enhance the therapeutic relationship itself. When therapists acknowledge and explore spiritual concerns within the therapeutic context, they create a safe space for clients to express their beliefs and values. This openness fosters trust and rapport, which are essential for effective therapy (Rogers, 1999). By integrating spiritual discussions into therapy sessions, practitioners can facilitate clients’ exploration of existential questions and spiritual crises, promoting healing and personal growth. This integrative approach ultimately enhances the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions by addressing the whole person.

Educational Settings

In educational settings, integrating science and spirituality can foster holistic development among students. Programs that emphasize social-emotional learning (SEL) often incorporate spiritual dimensions to cultivate resilience, empathy, and self-awareness (Zins et al., 2004). By integrating mindfulness and other contemplative practices into school curricula, educators can help students develop a greater understanding of their inner lives and foster emotional regulation skills. Research indicates that students who engage in mindfulness practices demonstrate improved focus, reduced stress, and enhanced academic performance (Zenner et al., 2014). This approach not only supports academic success but also nurtures students’ spiritual growth, promoting a well-rounded educational experience.

Moreover, integrating spirituality into educational practices can enhance teachers’ professional development and well-being. Educators who cultivate their own spiritual practices are better equipped to create supportive classroom environments that foster student growth (Miller, 2007). Professional development programs that incorporate mindfulness and self-reflection allow teachers to explore their beliefs and values, leading to improved job satisfaction and reduced burnout (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009). By promoting the well-being of educators, schools can create a positive ripple effect that enhances the overall learning environment for students.

Finally, fostering partnerships between educational institutions and spiritual communities can provide additional resources for students and families. Schools that collaborate with local spiritual organizations can offer programs that emphasize character education, community service, and personal development (Lickona, 1991). These partnerships can provide students with opportunities to engage in meaningful service activities that align with their spiritual values, fostering a sense of purpose and connectedness. By integrating science and spirituality in educational contexts, schools can cultivate well-rounded individuals who are equipped to navigate the complexities of life with resilience and compassion.

Community and Social Initiatives

Integrating science and spirituality into community and social initiatives can lead to more effective approaches to addressing societal challenges. Community programs that incorporate spiritual practices, such as meditation, prayer, or contemplative dialogue, can foster social cohesion and support mental health within diverse populations (Pargament et al., 2000). Research shows that community-based interventions that acknowledge and embrace spiritual diversity tend to promote greater well-being and resilience among participants (Zinn et al., 2016). By recognizing the role of spirituality in individuals’ lives, community initiatives can create environments that encourage holistic healing and personal growth.

Moreover, addressing social issues through an integrative lens can enhance the effectiveness of social services. Programs that recognize the spiritual dimensions of clients’ experiences, particularly in areas such as addiction recovery, mental health, and grief counseling, can lead to more comprehensive support (Grof, 2000). For instance, addiction recovery programs that incorporate spiritual principles often yield better outcomes by addressing the underlying existential questions that contribute to substance abuse (White, 2009). By integrating spiritual support within therapeutic frameworks, social initiatives can empower individuals to find purpose and meaning in their lives, facilitating long-term recovery and healing.

Finally, community engagement initiatives that promote interfaith dialogue and collaboration can foster understanding and respect among diverse spiritual traditions. By bringing together individuals from various backgrounds to engage in conversations about spirituality and social justice, communities can cultivate a greater sense of unity and shared purpose (Miller, 2007). These initiatives can address pressing social issues such as poverty, discrimination, and environmental sustainability, promoting collective action rooted in shared values. Through the integration of science and spirituality, communities can develop comprehensive strategies that enhance social well-being and foster a more compassionate society.

Challenges and Critiques of Integrative Approaches

Conceptual Challenges

One of the primary challenges in integrating science and spirituality within psychology is the inherent complexity of defining both concepts. While science relies on empirical evidence and objective measures, spirituality encompasses a vast array of subjective experiences, beliefs, and practices that can vary significantly across cultures and individuals (Holt, 1972). This complexity makes it difficult to create a unified framework that adequately captures the multifaceted nature of human consciousness. Scholars have critiqued the attempts to reconcile these domains, arguing that oversimplification can lead to a misunderstanding of both scientific and spiritual phenomena (Wilber, 2000). As such, developing clear definitions and boundaries for both science and spirituality remains a pressing concern in the field.

Moreover, the potential for conflating spirituality with psychological constructs poses another conceptual challenge. For instance, some researchers may interpret spiritual experiences as mere psychological phenomena rather than as distinct experiences with inherent value (Tart, 1975). This perspective risks diminishing the significance of spiritual practices and beliefs in individuals’ lives, which could ultimately lead to the neglect of these dimensions in therapeutic settings. Critics argue that the psychological interpretation of spiritual experiences often fails to account for the richness and depth of these experiences, potentially resulting in a reductionist view that undermines the integrative aims of psychology (Grof, 2000).

Finally, the integration of science and spirituality raises questions about the appropriateness of blending methodologies from both domains. The scientific method emphasizes objectivity, replicability, and control, while spiritual practices often emphasize personal experience and subjective understanding (Miller, 2007). Critics argue that merging these methodologies could compromise the rigor of scientific inquiry, leading to a dilution of empirical standards in favor of subjective interpretations. As a result, establishing a balanced approach that respects the integrity of both science and spirituality presents a significant conceptual challenge for researchers and practitioners in integral psychology.

Ethical Considerations

The integration of science and spirituality in psychological practice raises several ethical concerns that must be carefully navigated. One significant issue is the potential for imposing the therapist’s spiritual beliefs on clients. Ethical guidelines emphasize the importance of respecting clients’ autonomy and belief systems, yet the integration of spirituality into therapy can blur the lines between the therapist’s beliefs and the client’s experiences (Sperry, 2001). This challenge underscores the need for practitioners to maintain a clear distinction between their personal beliefs and the therapeutic process, ensuring that clients feel safe and supported in exploring their spiritual journeys without feeling pressured to conform to the therapist’s worldview.

Another ethical consideration pertains to the assessment and evaluation of spiritual practices within clinical settings. When incorporating spiritual interventions, therapists must be cautious to avoid assuming that all clients will benefit from these practices (Harris et al., 2016). Some individuals may have negative experiences with spirituality or may not identify with any spiritual tradition, making it crucial for therapists to assess clients’ preferences and comfort levels regarding spiritual discussions. Practitioners should adopt a client-centered approach that prioritizes individual needs, ensuring that spiritual interventions are tailored to each client’s unique context and beliefs.

Additionally, the integration of spirituality into psychological practice can raise concerns regarding informed consent. Clients should be adequately informed about the potential implications of engaging in spiritual practices within therapy, including any risks or limitations associated with these interventions (Miller, 2007). Ethical practice necessitates transparency about the role of spirituality in treatment, allowing clients to make informed decisions regarding their therapeutic journey. By addressing these ethical considerations, practitioners can promote a responsible and respectful integration of science and spirituality within psychological practice.

Empirical Critiques

Despite the growing interest in integrative approaches, empirical critiques remain a significant hurdle for the integration of science and spirituality in psychology. One notable concern is the lack of robust empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of spiritual interventions in clinical settings. While numerous studies suggest positive outcomes associated with spiritual practices, many of these studies suffer from methodological limitations, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and insufficient longitudinal data (Gonzalez et al., 2015). Critics argue that these limitations hinder the ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of integrating spirituality into psychological treatment.

Moreover, the variability in how spirituality is defined and measured across studies complicates the empirical evaluation of integrative approaches. Different researchers may employ varying definitions and assessments of spirituality, leading to inconsistent findings and making it challenging to establish a standardized approach (Zinn et al., 2016). This lack of consistency can hinder the development of a cohesive body of literature that demonstrates the effectiveness of integrative practices, ultimately undermining the credibility of the approach.

Finally, the reliance on subjective self-report measures in spiritual research raises questions about the validity and reliability of findings. Many studies assess spiritual experiences through self-report questionnaires, which may be influenced by personal biases and cultural factors (Pargament, 2007). Critics argue that this reliance on subjective measures can lead to overestimations of the impact of spirituality on psychological outcomes, emphasizing the need for more rigorous, objective assessments. Addressing these empirical critiques is essential for advancing the integration of science and spirituality in psychology and ensuring that practitioners can confidently apply these approaches in clinical practice.

Conclusion

The integration of science and spirituality within integral psychology presents a promising yet complex framework for understanding human consciousness and well-being. By embracing a holistic perspective that recognizes the interplay between psychological and spiritual dimensions, practitioners can create more comprehensive therapeutic approaches that address the multifaceted nature of human experience (Wilber, 2000). This integrative model not only enhances the effectiveness of clinical interventions but also fosters personal growth and resilience among individuals, ultimately contributing to greater overall well-being. As the field of integral psychology continues to evolve, the ongoing exploration of this intersection holds the potential to transform both theoretical frameworks and practical applications in psychology.

However, despite its potential benefits, the integration of science and spirituality faces several challenges and critiques. Conceptual complexities, ethical considerations, and empirical critiques underscore the need for careful navigation in this integrative endeavor (Miller, 2007). Establishing clear definitions and boundaries for both science and spirituality is essential for developing a cohesive framework that respects the integrity of each domain. Moreover, ethical considerations surrounding the therapist-client relationship must be prioritized to ensure that clients feel safe and supported in exploring their spiritual beliefs without coercion. Empirical critiques emphasize the importance of rigorous research methods to substantiate the efficacy of integrative approaches, reinforcing the need for a balanced application of scientific and spiritual practices.

In conclusion, the integration of science and spirituality in integral psychology offers a valuable opportunity to enhance therapeutic practices and promote holistic well-being. By addressing the challenges and critiques associated with this integration, practitioners can work toward creating a more inclusive and effective psychological framework that honors the richness of human experience (Grof, 2000). As this field continues to develop, ongoing dialogue and research will be essential in refining integrative methodologies and fostering a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between psychology and spirituality. Ultimately, this integrative approach holds the potential to not only enrich individual lives but also contribute to the broader understanding of human nature in the pursuit of psychological and spiritual growth.

Bibliography

Benson, H., Beary, J. F., & Carol, M. P. (1996). The relaxation response. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 9(1), 1-10.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211-237.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Davidson, R. J., Sheridan, J. F., & Foltz, C. (2003). Anterior cingulate cortex and the regulation of emotion. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(1), 33-40.
Davis, E. (2012). The science of consciousness: A multidisciplinary approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Gonzalez, M., Wang, Y., & Reardon, R. (2015). The role of spirituality in psychotherapy: A review of the literature. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(2), 130-142.
Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M. S., et al. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 357-368.
Grof, S. (2000). The future of psychotherapy: Integrating spirituality into the healing process. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 37(4), 415-423.
Harris, D. A., Thoresen, C. E., & McCullough, M. E. (2016). Religious involvement and health outcomes: A review of the evidence and implications for health care. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 243-261.
Holt, R. (1972). Science and spirituality: The origins and limits of scientific inquiry. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 1059-1071.
Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Dell Publishing.
Lange, R. (2012). Scientific skepticism and spirituality: Exploring the boundaries. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 31(4), 334-344.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Miller, J. (2007). The relationship between spirituality and wellness. Social Work in Health Care, 45(1), 55-66.
Pahnke, W. N. (1969). Drugs and mysticism: An analysis of the relationship between the drug experience and the mystical experience. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1(1), 73-101.
Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and the quality of life. Journal of Community Psychology, 10(3), 299-310.
Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(1), 91-100.
Pargament, K. I., Smith, B. W., & Koenig, H. G. (2000). Religious coping methods as predictors of psychological outcomes in patients with medical illness. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(4), 503-511.
Rogers, C. (1999). A way of being. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Sperry, L. (2001). Spirituality in clinical practice: A rationale for the integration of spirituality and psychology. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29(2), 147-156.
Tart, C. T. (1975). States of consciousness. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
White, W. L. (2009). Spirituality and recovery: A perspective on the role of spirituality in recovery from addiction. Substance Use & Misuse, 44(11), 1572-1586.
Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.
Zenner, C., Herrnleben-Kurz, S., & Walach, H. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 603.
Zinn, M., Desmarais, S., & Walker, C. (2016). Mindfulness in the community: A holistic approach to promoting well-being. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2(1), 17-33.
Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). The impact of social and emotional learning on school and life success. Social Emotional Learning: What the Research Says, 1-24.