Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Collective Consciousness

This article explores the concept of collective consciousness through a cross-cultural lens within the framework of transpersonal psychology. By examining the perspectives of indigenous cultures, Eastern philosophies, and Western thought, the article highlights the diverse manifestations and implications of collective consciousness in shaping communal identities and cultural narratives. It discusses the impact of modern technology and globalization on collective identity, emphasizing the emergence of digital communities and the blending of cultural narratives. Through case studies of indigenous practices and contemporary social movements, the article illustrates the relevance of collective consciousness in understanding psychological and spiritual dimensions across cultures. This exploration aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of collective consciousness and its significance in fostering interconnectedness and shared human experience in an increasingly globalized world.

Introduction

The concept of collective consciousness has gained significant attention in both psychological and sociological discourse, particularly within the realm of transpersonal psychology. It refers to the shared beliefs, ideas, and moral attitudes that operate as a unifying force within a group or culture (Durkheim, 1912). This phenomenon transcends individual consciousness, suggesting that individuals within a community are interconnected through a shared psychological and spiritual framework. Understanding collective consciousness is essential for recognizing how cultural narratives and shared experiences shape individual identities and behaviors.

Cross-cultural perspectives on collective consciousness reveal the diverse ways in which different societies conceptualize and engage with this idea. Indigenous cultures, for instance, often emphasize the importance of communal rituals and traditions that foster a sense of belonging and shared identity (Burgess, 2003). In contrast, Eastern philosophies, such as those found in Hinduism and Buddhism, frame collective consciousness through concepts like “Brahman,” which represents the ultimate reality and interconnectedness of all beings (Eck, 2012). By exploring these varying cultural interpretations, we can gain insight into the underlying psychological mechanisms that contribute to the formation and maintenance of collective consciousness across different societies.

Moreover, the interplay between collective consciousness and modern societal dynamics cannot be overlooked. With the advent of digital technology and globalization, traditional notions of collective consciousness are evolving, giving rise to new forms of communal identity and shared experience. Social media platforms and online communities facilitate the rapid dissemination of ideas and cultural narratives, creating a global tapestry of collective consciousness that transcends geographic boundaries (Castells, 2012). This article aims to delve into these cross-cultural perspectives on collective consciousness, examining its significance in fostering interconnectedness and shaping the psychological landscape of human experience.

Theoretical Framework

Historical Context

The concept of collective consciousness was notably advanced by French sociologist Émile Durkheim, who argued that it is a fundamental characteristic of social life that binds individuals together through shared beliefs and values (Durkheim, 1912). In his seminal work, “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life,” Durkheim posited that collective consciousness emerges from the collective experiences and rituals of a community, serving as a regulatory force that shapes individual behavior and societal norms. He asserted that this shared consciousness is not merely an aggregate of individual thoughts but a distinct entity that influences and organizes social life. Durkheim’s perspective laid the groundwork for understanding collective consciousness as a social phenomenon rather than a purely psychological one.

Building on Durkheim’s foundation, Carl Jung introduced the notion of the “collective unconscious,” which he differentiated from the collective consciousness. Jung’s collective unconscious encompasses the archetypes and innate symbols that all humans share, transcending cultural and individual differences (Jung, 1964). He believed that these archetypes manifest in myths, dreams, and art, influencing how societies construct their identities and narratives. Jung’s exploration of the collective unconscious emphasizes the deep psychological roots of collective experience, suggesting that cultural symbols and myths serve as conduits for shared human experiences across generations.

Definitions and Key Concepts

The term “collective consciousness” encompasses several interrelated concepts, including social norms, shared beliefs, and cultural myths. At its core, it reflects the idea that individuals within a community are influenced by a common psychological framework that shapes their understanding of the world (Cohen, 1985). This shared framework is crucial for fostering a sense of belonging and social cohesion, enabling individuals to navigate complex social landscapes. In transpersonal psychology, collective consciousness is often viewed as a bridge between individual experiences and broader societal dynamics, highlighting the interconnectedness of human beings within a shared spiritual and psychological context.

Moreover, the concept of collective consciousness is closely tied to the idea of cultural memory, which refers to the ways in which societies remember and transmit their shared history and identity (Assmann, 1992). Cultural memory is constructed through narratives, rituals, and symbols that reinforce collective identity and values. In this sense, collective consciousness is not static but dynamic, evolving in response to cultural shifts, technological advancements, and social changes. Understanding these key concepts provides a framework for examining how collective consciousness operates across different cultures and contexts, revealing the intricate relationship between individual and collective experiences.

Cross-Cultural Perspectives

Indigenous Cultures

Indigenous cultures provide profound insights into collective consciousness, as they often prioritize communal values, traditions, and spiritual practices that foster a sense of shared identity. For many indigenous communities, collective consciousness is intertwined with their understanding of the natural world, where the land, ancestors, and spiritual entities are seen as integral components of existence (Burgess, 2003). Rituals and ceremonies, such as the Sun Dance among Plains tribes or the Potlatch of the Pacific Northwest, exemplify how collective consciousness is expressed and reinforced through communal participation. These practices not only solidify social bonds but also serve as a means of transmitting cultural knowledge and identity across generations.

Moreover, indigenous narratives often highlight the interconnectedness of individuals within their communities and with the broader cosmos. For instance, the Aboriginal concept of “Dreamtime” encapsulates the belief in an eternal, cyclical existence where the past, present, and future are interconnected (Gammage, 2011). This worldview emphasizes that individual actions and experiences are reflective of a collective journey, underscoring the importance of harmony with nature and community. As indigenous scholars have argued, these narratives challenge Western individualistic perspectives and highlight the significance of collective experiences in shaping identity and spirituality (Smith, 2012).

Additionally, the concept of collective consciousness in indigenous cultures often includes a strong sense of responsibility toward the environment and future generations. This is evident in practices such as sustainable land management, which is rooted in the understanding that the well-being of the community is tied to the health of the land (Berkes, 2012). Indigenous peoples often view themselves as stewards of the earth, emphasizing a collective obligation to protect and preserve natural resources. This ecological perspective further enriches the understanding of collective consciousness by illustrating how cultural beliefs and practices shape not only social identity but also environmental ethics.

Finally, the resilience of indigenous cultures in the face of colonization and globalization offers important lessons about collective consciousness. Despite the imposition of external beliefs and systems, many indigenous communities have successfully revitalized their cultural practices and collective identities (Alfred, 2005). This resilience is often attributed to a strong sense of collective consciousness that fosters solidarity and community strength. By maintaining their cultural heritage and adapting it to contemporary contexts, indigenous peoples exemplify the enduring power of collective consciousness as a means of cultural survival and identity affirmation.

Eastern Philosophies

Eastern philosophies, particularly those rooted in Hinduism and Buddhism, offer rich perspectives on collective consciousness that emphasize interconnectedness and shared existence. In Hindu thought, the concept of “Brahman” represents the ultimate reality that underlies all existence, suggesting a fundamental unity among all beings (Eck, 2012). This philosophical framework posits that individual consciousness is an expression of the greater collective consciousness, where the realization of this interconnectedness is key to spiritual enlightenment. Practices such as yoga and meditation serve as pathways for individuals to transcend their egoic identities and tap into this collective consciousness, fostering a sense of unity with others and the universe.

Buddhism, on the other hand, emphasizes the interdependent nature of all phenomena, encapsulated in the concept of “dependent origination” (Thich Nhat Hanh, 1998). This principle asserts that everything exists in relation to everything else, highlighting the interconnectedness of individual and collective experiences. In Buddhist practice, mindfulness and compassion serve as tools for individuals to recognize their connection to others, promoting a sense of collective well-being. The communal aspect of Buddhism is further reflected in the Sangha, or community of practitioners, which embodies the collective consciousness of shared values and spiritual goals (Kraft, 2000).

Moreover, Eastern philosophies often integrate metaphysical concepts that influence the understanding of collective consciousness. For example, Taoism emphasizes the harmony of the individual with the Tao, or the Way, which represents the fundamental principle underlying the universe (Chuang Tzu, 2003). This philosophy encourages individuals to align themselves with the collective flow of existence, recognizing that personal fulfillment is intertwined with the well-being of the community and the environment. Such teachings highlight the importance of balancing individual desires with collective needs, illustrating a holistic approach to consciousness that transcends individualism.

Lastly, the role of collective rituals and communal practices in Eastern traditions further exemplifies the manifestation of collective consciousness. Festivals, ceremonies, and communal meditative practices serve as expressions of shared identity and purpose, reinforcing the sense of belonging within a larger community (Eck, 2012). These practices not only enhance individual spiritual experiences but also contribute to the cultivation of collective consciousness, fostering unity and shared understanding among participants. By exploring these Eastern philosophies, we gain valuable insights into the diverse ways in which collective consciousness is understood and experienced across cultures.

Western Perspectives

In Western thought, collective consciousness has evolved through various philosophical and psychological frameworks that emphasize social dynamics and cultural narratives. The Enlightenment period marked a significant shift in understanding human consciousness, with philosophers such as Hegel proposing that individual consciousness is shaped by historical and cultural contexts (Hegel, 1977). Hegel’s dialectical method posits that the development of consciousness occurs through a collective process, where individuals engage in social and political life, thus shaping the collective consciousness of their time. This perspective underscores the importance of societal structures and historical forces in shaping individual identities and collective values.

The impact of social movements in shaping collective consciousness is a key theme in contemporary Western discourse. The Civil Rights Movement, for instance, exemplifies how collective action can galvanize a shared consciousness around issues of justice and equality (Tilly & Tarrow, 2007). This movement not only brought awareness to systemic injustices but also fostered a collective identity among participants that transcended individual differences. The narratives and symbols that emerged during this period served to unify diverse groups, illustrating the power of collective consciousness in driving social change.

Furthermore, the rise of social psychology has contributed to the understanding of collective consciousness by examining group dynamics and identity formation. Research in social identity theory, proposed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner, emphasizes how individuals derive part of their self-concept from their group memberships (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). This perspective highlights the ways in which collective identities influence individual behavior and social interactions. By exploring how group membership fosters a sense of belonging and collective consciousness, social psychology provides valuable insights into the mechanisms that underpin group dynamics and cultural cohesion.

Lastly, the emergence of digital technology and globalization has transformed the landscape of collective consciousness in the West. The internet and social media platforms have created new avenues for individuals to connect and engage with shared ideas, fostering a global collective consciousness that transcends geographic boundaries (Castells, 2012). As individuals increasingly participate in online communities, the nature of collective consciousness is evolving, blending local traditions with global narratives. This phenomenon raises important questions about identity, belonging, and the impact of technology on the collective psyche, highlighting the need for continued exploration of collective consciousness in a rapidly changing world.

Collective Consciousness and Modern Society

Impact of Technology

The advent of digital technology has profoundly reshaped the landscape of collective consciousness, facilitating unprecedented connectivity among individuals and communities worldwide. Social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram serve as virtual spaces where users can share experiences, beliefs, and values, fostering a sense of belonging and collective identity (Bennett & Segerberg, 2013). These platforms enable the rapid dissemination of information, allowing users to engage in real-time discussions and mobilize collective action around various social and political issues. As a result, collective consciousness is increasingly defined by digital interactions, where online communities can emerge around shared interests, identities, or causes, often transcending geographic and cultural boundaries.

Moreover, the role of technology in shaping collective consciousness can be seen in the phenomenon of “hashtag activism.” Movements such as #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo illustrate how social media can catalyze collective awareness and action on critical social issues (Tufekci, 2017). Through the use of hashtags, individuals can join conversations, share personal experiences, and mobilize support for social justice initiatives, creating a collective narrative that amplifies marginalized voices. This democratization of information enables individuals to contribute to collective consciousness, shaping public discourse and influencing societal change in ways that were not possible before the digital age.

However, the impact of technology on collective consciousness is not without its challenges. The proliferation of misinformation and the rise of echo chambers pose significant threats to the integrity of collective awareness. Algorithms employed by social media platforms often prioritize content that aligns with users’ preexisting beliefs, leading to the reinforcement of divisive narratives and polarization (Sunstein, 2001). This phenomenon can create fragmented collective consciousness, where individuals are isolated within like-minded communities that hinder constructive dialogue and understanding. Thus, while technology has the potential to enhance collective consciousness, it also necessitates critical engagement and media literacy to navigate the complexities of digital interactions.

Globalization and Cultural Exchange

Globalization has further transformed collective consciousness by facilitating the exchange of ideas, beliefs, and practices across cultures. This interconnectedness has led to the blending of cultural narratives, where diverse traditions and worldviews inform one another, resulting in a more pluralistic understanding of identity (Appadurai, 1996). For example, the integration of Eastern philosophical concepts, such as mindfulness and yoga, into Western wellness practices illustrates how cultural exchange can enrich collective consciousness by promoting holistic approaches to well-being.

In addition to enriching collective consciousness, globalization raises questions about cultural homogenization and the loss of indigenous practices and identities. As global culture becomes increasingly dominant, there is a risk that local customs and traditions may be overshadowed or commodified (Tomlinson, 1999). This phenomenon can lead to a superficial understanding of cultural elements, reducing their significance and depth. Nevertheless, many communities actively resist this trend by revitalizing and adapting their cultural practices, demonstrating resilience and a commitment to maintaining their unique identities within a global context (Hannerz, 1990).

Furthermore, globalization has also facilitated the emergence of transnational movements that embody collective consciousness across borders. Initiatives such as climate activism and human rights campaigns illustrate how individuals and communities can unite around shared values and concerns, transcending national boundaries (Della Porta & Diani, 2006). These movements often leverage technology to coordinate efforts and mobilize support, exemplifying how collective consciousness can evolve in response to global challenges. By fostering a sense of shared responsibility for the planet and humanity, these movements highlight the potential of collective consciousness to drive meaningful change in modern society.

Collective Consciousness in Social Movements

Social movements play a pivotal role in shaping collective consciousness, often serving as catalysts for social change and awareness. Historically, movements advocating for civil rights, environmental justice, and gender equality have emerged as expressions of collective consciousness, mobilizing individuals around shared grievances and aspirations (Tilly & Tarrow, 2015). These movements create collective identities that empower individuals to challenge systemic injustices and advocate for social transformation. By articulating shared narratives and goals, social movements enhance the collective consciousness of participants, fostering solidarity and shared purpose.

One significant example is the environmental movement, which has mobilized collective consciousness around issues of climate change and ecological sustainability. Organizations such as Greenpeace and the Sierra Club have worked to raise awareness about environmental degradation, emphasizing the interconnectedness of human activities and the health of the planet (Houghton, 2009). Through grassroots activism, educational campaigns, and public demonstrations, these movements have shaped public discourse and policy, illustrating how collective consciousness can galvanize collective action for the greater good. The rise of youth-led climate activism, exemplified by movements like Fridays for Future, further underscores the potential of collective consciousness to drive intergenerational change.

Similarly, the feminist movement has played a crucial role in shaping collective consciousness around gender equality and women’s rights. By highlighting shared experiences of oppression and advocating for systemic change, feminist movements have fostered a collective identity that empowers individuals to challenge patriarchal structures (Tong, 2009). Through initiatives such as the Women’s March and campaigns like #MeToo, feminists have utilized collective consciousness to amplify their voices and advocate for social justice. These movements not only raise awareness but also foster a sense of agency among participants, illustrating the transformative power of collective consciousness in addressing systemic inequalities.

Challenges and Criticisms

Despite the potential of collective consciousness to drive social change, several challenges and criticisms must be acknowledged. One significant concern is the potential for collective consciousness to reinforce conformity and suppress dissenting voices. While collective identity can foster solidarity, it can also create an environment where individuals feel pressured to conform to group norms, stifling critical thinking and individual expression (Moscovici, 1985). This phenomenon is particularly evident in highly polarized societies, where groupthink can undermine constructive dialogue and perpetuate divisions.

Additionally, the commodification of collective consciousness in contemporary society poses ethical dilemmas. As social movements and cultural narratives become commercialized, there is a risk that the authenticity and depth of these movements may be diluted (Klein, 2000). This commodification can lead to “slacktivism,” where individuals engage in superficial forms of activism that do not result in meaningful change (Morozov, 2011). The challenge lies in ensuring that collective consciousness remains rooted in genuine engagement and commitment to social justice rather than mere performance or consumption.

Moreover, the digital landscape can amplify the challenges associated with collective consciousness, as misinformation and polarization hinder constructive discourse. The prevalence of fake news and divisive rhetoric can distort collective awareness, leading to a fragmented understanding of shared realities (Sunstein, 2001). In this context, fostering media literacy and critical thinking becomes essential for navigating the complexities of collective consciousness in the digital age. Engaging in meaningful conversations and seeking diverse perspectives can help counteract the negative effects of misinformation and polarization.

Lastly, it is crucial to recognize that collective consciousness is not universally experienced or accessible. Marginalized communities often face barriers to participation in collective consciousness, as systemic inequalities and power dynamics can hinder their voices from being heard (Crenshaw, 1989). Addressing these disparities is essential for fostering a more inclusive and equitable collective consciousness that genuinely reflects the diversity of human experiences. Ensuring that all voices are acknowledged and valued is key to realizing the transformative potential of collective consciousness in modern society.

Case Studies

Indigenous Communities

Indigenous communities around the world provide powerful examples of collective consciousness through their rich cultural practices and communal experiences. For instance, the Maori of New Zealand emphasize the concept of “whanaungatanga,” which refers to kinship and the interconnectedness of relationships within the community (Durie, 1998). This collective consciousness is manifested in their customs, rituals, and storytelling traditions, which serve to reinforce a shared identity and history. The Maori worldview encapsulates the belief that individuals are part of a larger whole, where each person’s actions have repercussions for the community and the environment. By participating in communal activities, such as the haka—a traditional dance performed during ceremonies—members of the community reinforce their connection to each other and their shared heritage.

Another compelling example is the Native American practice of the “Circle Process,” which embodies collective consciousness in decision-making and conflict resolution (Pranis, 2005). This approach emphasizes inclusivity, where every voice is heard and valued, fostering a sense of belonging among participants. The Circle Process facilitates dialogue and consensus-building, allowing communities to address issues collaboratively while honoring their shared cultural values. This collective method not only strengthens social ties but also reinforces the importance of community well-being, illustrating how indigenous practices serve as vital expressions of collective consciousness.

Moreover, the concept of “songlines” among Aboriginal Australians highlights the significance of collective memory and cultural identity. Songlines are narratives that connect the land, its features, and the stories of the ancestors, guiding individuals through the landscape while preserving cultural knowledge (Gammage, 2011). By singing these songs during communal gatherings, Aboriginal people not only reinforce their connection to the land but also strengthen their collective identity as custodians of their cultural heritage. This practice underscores the role of collective consciousness in maintaining a sense of place and belonging, as well as the interconnectedness between people, land, and spiritual beliefs.

Furthermore, the revitalization of traditional practices among indigenous communities exemplifies the resilience of collective consciousness in the face of colonization and globalization. For instance, many tribes in North America have reintroduced traditional ceremonies and cultural practices that were suppressed during colonial rule (Smith, 2012). These efforts to reclaim and revitalize cultural traditions highlight the enduring power of collective consciousness as a means of fostering community strength and identity. By engaging in these practices, indigenous peoples not only assert their cultural heritage but also create spaces for collective healing and empowerment.

Contemporary Movements

Contemporary social movements serve as powerful expressions of collective consciousness, mobilizing individuals around shared goals and experiences. The #BlackLivesMatter movement is a prominent example of how collective consciousness can galvanize social action against systemic racism and police violence (Taylor, 2016). Emerging from grassroots activism, this movement has united diverse voices and perspectives, emphasizing the importance of intersectionality in understanding the complexities of racial injustice. By leveraging social media platforms, activists have amplified their messages and created a collective narrative that resonates across communities, fostering solidarity and engagement.

In addition to addressing racial inequality, contemporary movements like the Women’s March illustrate how collective consciousness can mobilize individuals around gender equality and social justice. The inaugural Women’s March in January 2017 drew millions of participants worldwide, highlighting a shared commitment to women’s rights and social change (Hoffman, 2018). This movement not only underscored the interconnectedness of various social issues but also fostered a sense of collective identity among participants. By creating a platform for diverse voices, the Women’s March exemplified how collective consciousness can drive activism and inspire collective action for justice.

The environmental movement also serves as a powerful case study of collective consciousness in contemporary society. Organizations like Greenpeace and Extinction Rebellion have mobilized individuals around the urgent need for climate action, emphasizing the interconnectedness of environmental issues and social justice (Klein, 2014). By raising awareness about climate change and its impacts, these movements foster a collective consciousness that encourages individuals to engage in sustainable practices and advocate for systemic change. The youth-led climate strikes, inspired by activist Greta Thunberg, further demonstrate how collective consciousness can transcend generational divides, uniting individuals in the pursuit of a sustainable future.

Moreover, the LGBTQ+ rights movement exemplifies the transformative potential of collective consciousness in advocating for social change. The Stonewall Riots of 1969 marked a pivotal moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights, igniting a collective consciousness that challenged societal norms and discrimination (Duberman, 1993). Over the decades, this movement has grown to encompass a diverse array of voices and experiences, advocating for equality, representation, and acceptance. Pride events around the world celebrate this collective identity, fostering a sense of belonging and solidarity among LGBTQ+ individuals and their allies. Through collective action, the movement continues to challenge oppressive structures and promote social justice.

Global Solidarity Movements

The emergence of global solidarity movements highlights the power of collective consciousness to address transnational issues. Initiatives like the Global Climate Strike demonstrate how individuals across borders can unite around a shared commitment to environmental justice. These movements often leverage digital platforms to coordinate actions and share information, illustrating how collective consciousness can transcend geographical boundaries (Castells, 2012). By engaging in collective actions such as protests and awareness campaigns, participants foster a sense of global solidarity that emphasizes the interconnectedness of humanity in addressing pressing challenges.

In the context of economic inequality, the Occupy Wall Street movement serves as another example of collective consciousness in action. Emerging in 2011, this movement sought to challenge the influence of corporate power and advocate for social and economic justice (Klein, 2014). Through the slogan “We are the 99%,” participants articulated a collective identity that resonated with individuals facing economic hardships. The movement’s emphasis on direct democracy and consensus-building reinforced the importance of collective participation and empowerment in addressing systemic issues. By fostering a sense of collective consciousness, Occupy Wall Street catalyzed discussions about wealth distribution and social equity, highlighting the potential for grassroots movements to drive meaningful change.

Conclusion

The exploration of collective consciousness through cross-cultural perspectives reveals its profound significance in shaping individual and communal identities across diverse contexts. From indigenous practices that emphasize kinship and interconnectedness to contemporary movements advocating for social justice, collective consciousness serves as a powerful unifying force. It transcends individual experiences, fostering a shared understanding of cultural heritage, values, and aspirations. As illustrated by various case studies, collective consciousness not only reinforces social bonds but also empowers individuals to engage in collective action, challenge systemic injustices, and advocate for meaningful change (Tilly & Tarrow, 2015).

Moreover, the impact of modern technology and globalization has transformed the landscape of collective consciousness, providing new avenues for individuals to connect, share, and mobilize around shared goals. While the digital age has enhanced the capacity for collective engagement, it has also introduced challenges, such as misinformation and polarization, that can fragment collective awareness (Sunstein, 2001). As social movements increasingly leverage digital platforms to amplify their messages and coordinate actions, it becomes imperative to cultivate critical media literacy and foster inclusive dialogues that honor diverse perspectives. In this context, collective consciousness remains a dynamic and evolving construct that reflects the complexities of contemporary society.

Ultimately, understanding collective consciousness through a transpersonal lens offers valuable insights into the interconnectedness of human experiences and the potential for fostering empathy, solidarity, and social change. As we navigate the challenges of modern society, recognizing the importance of collective consciousness can inspire individuals and communities to work together toward a more just and equitable world. By honoring diverse cultural narratives and fostering inclusive practices, we can harness the transformative power of collective consciousness to promote healing, resilience, and shared purpose in an increasingly interconnected global landscape (Klein, 2014).

Bibliography

Alfred, T. (2005). Sovereignty Matters: Locations of Contestation and Possibility in Indigenous Struggles for Self-Determination. In Indigenous Sovereignty in the United States (pp. 1-26). University of Washington Press.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Assmann, J. (1992). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
Berk, M. P. (2012). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Taylor & Francis.
Burgess, J. (2003). Indigenous Knowledge and Its Role in the Preservation of Collective Memory. Journal of Indigenous Studies, 2(1), 25-40.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.
Chuang Tzu. (2003). Chuang Tzu: Basic Writings. Columbia University Press.
Cohen, A. P. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community. Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
Duberman, M. (1993). Stonewall. Dutton.
Durie, M. (1998). Whānau, Hapu, Iwi: A Maori Approach to Health and Wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 22(5), 627-628.
Durkheim, E. (1912). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Free Press.
Eck, D. L. (2012). A New Religious America: How a “Christian Country” Has Become the World’s Most Religiously Diverse Nation. HarperOne.
Gammage, B. (2011). The Biggest Estate on Earth: How Aborigines Made Australia. Allen & Unwin.
Hannerz, U. (1990). Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. Columbia University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press.
Hoffman, A. (2018). Women’s March: A New Era of Protest. New York Times.
Houghton, R. A. (2009). Carbon Flux to the Atmosphere from Land-Use Changes. In A. D. S. L. P. (Ed.), Global Carbon Project. Earth System Science Partnership.
Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. Doubleday.
Klein, N. (2000). No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. Knopf Canada.
Klein, N. (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. Simon & Schuster.
Kraft, K. (2000). Inner Peace, World Peace: Essays on Buddhism and Nonviolence. Parallax Press.
Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. PublicAffairs.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social Influence and Social Change. Academic Press.
Pranis, K. (2005). The Circle Process: A New Approach to Conflict Resolution. Peacemaking: A Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10(1), 25-42.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
Taylor, K.-Y. (2016). From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Haymarket Books.
Thich Nhat Hanh. (1998). The Heart of the Buddha’s Teaching: Transforming Suffering into Peace, Joy, and Liberation. Broadway Books.
Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press.
Tong, R. (2009). Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. Westview Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.