Ecotherapy: Healing through Nature in Transpersonal Practices

Ecotherapy, a therapeutic approach that integrates nature into the healing process, offers significant insights within the framework of transpersonal psychology. This article explores the historical context and theoretical foundations of ecotherapy, emphasizing its role in promoting psychological well-being, reducing stress, and fostering spiritual growth. By examining various ecotherapy practices—such as wilderness therapy, forest bathing, and horticultural therapy—the article highlights the mechanisms through which nature facilitates healing, including psychological benefits, physiological responses, and transpersonal experiences. Additionally, it addresses the challenges and critiques surrounding ecotherapy, focusing on accessibility, empirical support, and ethical considerations. Ultimately, this article advocates for the integration of ecotherapy into therapeutic practices, emphasizing its potential to enhance holistic healing and promote interconnectedness with the natural world.

Introduction

Ecotherapy, also known as nature therapy, is a therapeutic approach that harnesses the restorative power of nature to improve mental and physical well-being. Defined as a treatment that involves guided contact with nature, ecotherapy seeks to address psychological issues through engagement with the natural environment (Jordan et al., 2010). The growing recognition of the importance of nature in enhancing psychological health has led to an increasing interest in ecotherapy within various fields, including psychology, counseling, and holistic health. This approach is particularly significant in the context of transpersonal psychology, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of mind, body, spirit, and the environment. By focusing on the experiential aspects of nature and its profound impact on individuals, ecotherapy offers a unique lens through which to explore healing and personal transformation.

The relevance of nature to human well-being has been supported by numerous studies indicating that exposure to natural environments can lead to significant reductions in stress, anxiety, and depression (Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989; Ulrich, 1991). Nature-based interventions not only improve mood but also foster feelings of connection and purpose, facilitating deeper spiritual insights (Hartig et al., 2014). In transpersonal psychology, these experiences align with the exploration of consciousness and the expansion of the self, allowing individuals to transcend their everyday limitations and reconnect with their intrinsic nature (Wilber, 2000). By integrating ecotherapy into therapeutic practices, mental health professionals can leverage the healing potential of nature to support clients on their journey toward holistic wellness.

This article aims to explore ecotherapy as a vital component of transpersonal practices, examining its historical context, mechanisms of healing, and various therapeutic interventions. Additionally, it will address the challenges and critiques surrounding the implementation of ecotherapy, including access to natural environments and the need for empirical validation. By emphasizing the importance of nature in psychological healing, this article seeks to promote a deeper understanding of how ecotherapy can enhance well-being and foster a more profound connection between individuals and the natural world.

Historical and Theoretical Context of Ecotherapy

Historical Background

Ecotherapy, although a relatively modern term, is rooted in ancient practices that recognized the healing power of nature. Indigenous cultures worldwide have long embraced the therapeutic benefits of natural environments, often incorporating nature-based rituals and practices into their healing traditions. For instance, Native American healing practices frequently involve connecting with the land, engaging in rituals that honor natural elements, and recognizing the spiritual significance of nature (Deloria, 2003). Such practices highlight an understanding of the interconnectedness between humans and their environment, forming the basis for contemporary ecotherapeutic practices.

The formalization of ecotherapy as a therapeutic approach emerged in the late 20th century, influenced by the development of ecopsychology. Ecopsychology posits that psychological distress often arises from a disconnection from nature and that reconnecting with the natural world can lead to healing (Roszak, 1992). In the 1990s, environmental psychologists began to explore the effects of nature on mental health, leading to a burgeoning interest in nature-based therapies. This interest was fueled by a growing body of evidence demonstrating that exposure to natural settings can reduce stress, enhance mood, and improve overall well-being (Kaplan, 1995; Ulrich, 1999). These findings have paved the way for ecotherapy to be integrated into various therapeutic practices, emphasizing the importance of nature in psychological healing.

Theoretical Frameworks

The theoretical frameworks underpinning ecotherapy draw from various disciplines, including psychology, environmental science, and philosophy. One of the foundational theories relevant to ecotherapy is the biophilia hypothesis, proposed by Edward O. Wilson (1984). This hypothesis suggests that humans have an innate affinity for nature and that this connection is essential for psychological well-being. Wilson’s work underscores the idea that nurturing this relationship with the natural world can lead to significant improvements in mental health and life satisfaction.

Environmental psychology further contributes to the understanding of ecotherapy by examining how physical environments influence human behavior and well-being. Research in this field has established that natural environments can evoke positive emotions, foster relaxation, and reduce feelings of fear and aggression (Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989). Moreover, studies have shown that views of nature from windows can enhance recovery from surgery and improve overall health outcomes (Ulrich, 1991). Such findings support the integration of nature into therapeutic settings, affirming that the environment plays a crucial role in psychological healing.

Transpersonal psychology, which emphasizes spiritual growth and the exploration of higher states of consciousness, also intersects with ecotherapy. This perspective posits that experiences in nature can lead to profound spiritual insights and transformations, facilitating a deeper understanding of self and interconnectedness with the universe (Wilber, 2000). The transpersonal approach aligns with ecotherapy’s goals of fostering holistic healing, encouraging individuals to transcend their everyday limitations and experience a greater sense of purpose and connection to the natural world. Such experiences can lead to what Maslow (1968) described as “peak experiences,” moments of profound insight and fulfillment that contribute to personal growth and self-actualization.

Ecotherapy practitioners often draw upon these theoretical frameworks to design nature-based interventions tailored to individual needs. For example, wilderness therapy programs integrate elements of adventure and exploration, providing participants with opportunities for self-discovery and personal growth in natural settings. Similarly, horticultural therapy utilizes gardening and plant care to promote emotional healing and well-being, emphasizing the therapeutic benefits of nurturing living things (Gonzalez et al., 2011). By grounding their practices in established theories, ecotherapists can effectively address the psychological needs of their clients while fostering a deeper connection to nature.

In summary, the historical and theoretical context of ecotherapy highlights its evolution from ancient practices to a recognized therapeutic approach rooted in contemporary psychology. By integrating insights from biophilia, environmental psychology, and transpersonal psychology, ecotherapy provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the healing power of nature. This multifaceted approach underscores the importance of reconnecting with the natural world as a means of enhancing well-being, promoting holistic healing, and facilitating personal growth.

Mechanisms of Healing through Nature

Ecotherapy leverages various mechanisms through which nature contributes to healing and psychological well-being. These mechanisms can be broadly categorized into psychological benefits, physiological effects, and spiritual or transpersonal dimensions. Understanding these processes is essential for appreciating how ecotherapy can serve as a valuable tool in mental health treatment.

Psychological Benefits

One of the most significant mechanisms through which nature promotes healing is its impact on psychological well-being. Numerous studies have demonstrated that exposure to natural environments can lead to reductions in stress, anxiety, and depression. For instance, Kaplan and Kaplan (1989) highlight that interactions with nature can facilitate relaxation and restoration, counteracting the mental fatigue often associated with urban living and modern life demands. The concept of “soft fascination,” introduced by the authors, suggests that natural environments capture attention without overwhelming cognitive resources, allowing individuals to recharge mentally.

A meta-analysis conducted by Bratman et al. (2019) further supports the psychological benefits of nature exposure, indicating that spending time in natural settings can significantly reduce negative emotions and increase positive feelings. This is particularly relevant in the context of transpersonal psychology, where emotional well-being is linked to personal growth and self-awareness. By providing a serene environment for reflection and introspection, nature can facilitate the exploration of inner experiences, fostering deeper emotional connections and enhancing self-acceptance (Hartig et al., 2014).

Additionally, nature provides a unique context for therapeutic interventions. For example, wilderness therapy programs often utilize the natural environment as a setting for personal growth and group dynamics. These programs promote self-discovery, resilience, and social skills, allowing participants to confront and process psychological challenges in a supportive and immersive context (Gass, 1993). The experiential learning opportunities presented by nature encourage individuals to develop coping strategies and foster a sense of agency, which is crucial for healing.

Physiological Effects

The physiological impact of nature on human health is another crucial mechanism of healing. Research has shown that exposure to natural environments can lead to a variety of positive physiological responses, including reductions in heart rate, blood pressure, and levels of the stress hormone cortisol (Ulrich, 1999). For instance, a study by Park et al. (2010) found that participants who engaged in forest bathing—immersing themselves in a forest environment—experienced significant decreases in blood pressure and increases in feelings of relaxation and well-being.

The mechanisms underlying these physiological effects are believed to be linked to the stress-reducing properties of nature. Exposure to natural stimuli can trigger the parasympathetic nervous system, promoting a state of calm and facilitating recovery from stress-related responses (Berto, 2005). This is particularly relevant for individuals dealing with chronic stress or anxiety, as the restorative effects of nature can counteract the physiological impacts of prolonged stress exposure.

Moreover, the presence of nature has been associated with improved immune function. Studies have indicated that spending time in green spaces can enhance immune responses, leading to better health outcomes (Li et al., 2016). This connection between nature and physical health further underscores the importance of incorporating ecotherapy into treatment plans for individuals facing both psychological and physical challenges.

Spiritual and Transpersonal Dimensions

Beyond psychological and physiological mechanisms, nature plays a vital role in fostering spiritual and transpersonal experiences. Ecotherapy often encourages individuals to reconnect with their spiritual selves, facilitating a deeper understanding of their place within the broader context of life and the universe. The transcendental qualities of nature can evoke feelings of awe, wonder, and interconnectedness, which are essential elements of transpersonal experiences (Wilber, 2000).

Many individuals report that time spent in natural settings leads to profound insights and moments of clarity. These experiences can serve as catalysts for personal transformation, allowing individuals to access deeper aspects of their consciousness and explore their spiritual beliefs (Hays & O’Connor, 2017). For example, the practice of mindfulness in nature, which involves being fully present in the natural environment, can enhance spiritual awareness and foster a sense of unity with the world around them (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).

Moreover, nature can facilitate collective experiences that deepen interpersonal connections and foster community. Group ecotherapy activities, such as community gardening or nature walks, promote social interactions that enhance feelings of belonging and shared purpose. These communal experiences can amplify the spiritual benefits of nature, creating a sense of collective consciousness that aligns with the principles of transpersonal psychology (Pavlovich et al., 2017).

In conclusion, the mechanisms of healing through nature are multifaceted, encompassing psychological, physiological, and spiritual dimensions. By understanding these mechanisms, practitioners can effectively harness the therapeutic potential of nature in their work, creating opportunities for individuals to experience profound healing and transformation. Ecotherapy not only promotes mental health but also fosters a deeper connection to the natural world, encouraging holistic well-being and personal growth.

Ecotherapy Practices and Interventions

Ecotherapy encompasses a diverse range of practices and interventions that leverage the healing power of nature to promote psychological well-being and personal growth. These practices can be broadly categorized into nature-based therapies, horticultural therapy, and community-based ecotherapy initiatives. Each approach offers unique benefits and aligns with different therapeutic goals, making ecotherapy a versatile tool in mental health treatment.

Types of Ecotherapy

1. Nature-Based Therapies

Nature-based therapies, including wilderness therapy and adventure therapy, involve immersive experiences in natural settings. These therapies are often conducted in remote or wilderness areas, where participants engage in activities such as hiking, camping, and rock climbing. The underlying philosophy is that nature provides a therapeutic context for individuals to confront personal challenges and develop coping skills (Gass, 1993).

Wilderness therapy has been particularly effective for adolescents and young adults facing behavioral and emotional challenges. Studies have shown that participants in wilderness therapy programs exhibit improvements in self-esteem, interpersonal relationships, and emotional regulation (Russell, 2001). By navigating the challenges of the wilderness, individuals often gain valuable insights into their strengths and resilience, which can be transformative.

2. Horticultural Therapy

Horticultural therapy utilizes gardening and plant care as therapeutic interventions. This practice is grounded in the belief that engaging with plants can foster emotional healing and enhance overall well-being (Gonzalez et al., 2011). Participants in horticultural therapy often cultivate gardens, participate in planting and harvesting, and engage in educational activities related to gardening.

Research has demonstrated the positive effects of horticultural therapy on mental health outcomes. For instance, a study by Sempik et al. (2010) found that individuals who participated in horticultural therapy experienced reductions in anxiety and depression, along with increased feelings of satisfaction and fulfillment. Additionally, gardening activities can enhance social interactions, as individuals often work collaboratively in community gardens or therapeutic horticulture programs, fostering a sense of belonging and community connection.

3. Animal-Assisted Therapy in Natural Settings

Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) is another form of ecotherapy that incorporates animals into the therapeutic process. Interactions with animals, particularly in natural settings, can promote emotional healing and reduce stress. Research indicates that spending time with animals can lead to increased oxytocin levels, which are associated with bonding and emotional well-being (Odendaal & Meintjes, 2003).

Programs that combine animal-assisted therapy with outdoor activities can enhance the therapeutic experience. For example, equine-assisted therapy, which involves interactions with horses, has been shown to improve emotional regulation, self-awareness, and communication skills among participants (Nanda et al., 2018). By fostering connections with both animals and nature, individuals can experience multifaceted healing and personal growth.

Ecotherapy in Professional Settings

The integration of ecotherapy into professional mental health practices is gaining traction among therapists and counselors. Many mental health professionals recognize the benefits of incorporating nature into their therapeutic approaches, creating opportunities for clients to engage with the natural environment during sessions. This can include conducting therapy sessions outdoors, utilizing nature as a therapeutic tool, or encouraging clients to participate in ecotherapy activities as part of their treatment plans.

For instance, therapists may encourage clients to practice mindfulness in nature, utilizing techniques such as guided imagery or mindfulness meditation while in a natural setting. Research has shown that nature-based mindfulness practices can significantly enhance emotional regulation and reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression (Martin et al., 2018). By creating a therapeutic alliance that includes nature, practitioners can help clients access the healing potential of the environment while fostering a deeper connection to their own experiences.

Community and Group Ecotherapy

Community-based ecotherapy initiatives provide opportunities for individuals to engage with nature in a social context. These initiatives often involve group activities, such as community gardening, nature walks, or conservation projects, and aim to foster social connections and enhance community well-being.

Participating in group ecotherapy activities can lead to improved social cohesion and a sense of belonging. Research indicates that community engagement in nature can reduce feelings of isolation and promote mental health (Hartig et al., 2014). Additionally, communal ecotherapy initiatives often emphasize environmental stewardship, encouraging participants to develop a sense of responsibility for their surroundings. This connection between personal well-being and environmental health is a core tenet of ecotherapy, reinforcing the idea that healing is a shared experience that extends beyond the individual.

By facilitating connections between individuals, nature, and the community, group ecotherapy initiatives can create a supportive environment for personal growth and healing. Participants often report increased feelings of empowerment and agency, as they contribute to positive change within their communities and cultivate meaningful relationships with others.

In conclusion, ecotherapy practices and interventions encompass a wide range of approaches that leverage the healing power of nature. From nature-based therapies and horticultural therapy to community-based initiatives, each practice offers unique benefits that can enhance psychological well-being and foster personal growth. By integrating ecotherapy into professional mental health practices, practitioners can create transformative experiences that promote holistic healing and deepen the connection between individuals and the natural world.

Challenges and Critiques of Ecotherapy

While ecotherapy has gained recognition as a valuable approach to promoting mental health and well-being, it is not without its challenges and critiques. These challenges can broadly be categorized into issues related to accessibility, empirical validation, and ethical considerations. Understanding these critiques is essential for advancing the practice of ecotherapy and ensuring that it effectively meets the needs of diverse populations.

Limitations of Ecotherapy

1. Access to Natural Spaces

One of the primary challenges of ecotherapy is the accessibility of natural environments. For many individuals, particularly those living in urban areas, access to green spaces and natural settings may be limited (Cree, 2016). Socioeconomic factors play a significant role in this disparity, as lower-income communities often lack nearby parks or natural areas that facilitate ecotherapeutic activities. Furthermore, individuals with disabilities may face additional barriers to accessing outdoor environments, which can hinder their participation in ecotherapy (Korpela et al., 2016).

This lack of access poses a significant limitation to the widespread implementation of ecotherapy. To address this issue, practitioners and researchers must explore innovative solutions, such as developing community gardens, enhancing urban green spaces, and creating nature-based programs that can be conducted within city environments. By increasing access to nature, ecotherapy can become a more inclusive and equitable practice.

2. Variability in Individual Responses

Another challenge in ecotherapy is the variability in individual responses to nature. While many people experience positive outcomes from ecotherapy, others may not respond in the same way. Factors such as personal preferences, cultural backgrounds, and past experiences with nature can influence how individuals perceive and engage with ecotherapy (Tuan, 1974). For instance, some individuals may feel uncomfortable or anxious in natural settings due to previous traumatic experiences or a lack of familiarity with the outdoors (Jain et al., 2020).

This variability complicates the standardization of ecotherapy practices and underscores the importance of tailoring interventions to meet the unique needs of each participant. Practitioners must remain flexible and responsive to individual differences, ensuring that ecotherapy is approached as a personalized and adaptable process.

Critiques from the Psychological Community

1. Empirical Support for Ecotherapy

Critics of ecotherapy often point to the need for more robust empirical evidence to support its efficacy. While numerous studies have demonstrated positive outcomes associated with nature exposure, many of these studies lack rigorous methodologies, such as control groups or long-term follow-up assessments (Bratman et al., 2019). As a result, skeptics argue that the claims surrounding ecotherapy may be overstated or based on anecdotal evidence rather than solid scientific research.

To address this critique, it is crucial for the field of ecotherapy to invest in high-quality research that explores the mechanisms of healing through nature and establishes empirical support for various ecotherapeutic interventions. This includes conducting randomized controlled trials, longitudinal studies, and meta-analyses that can provide a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy of ecotherapy across diverse populations and settings.

2. Over-Simplification of Nature’s Role

Another critique from the psychological community is the potential for over-simplification of nature’s role in healing. Some scholars argue that attributing psychological well-being solely to nature exposure may overlook other critical factors that contribute to mental health, such as social support, socioeconomic status, and individual psychological resilience (Hartig et al., 2014). This critique highlights the importance of recognizing the multifaceted nature of mental health and the various influences that shape an individual’s well-being.

In response to this critique, ecotherapy practitioners must emphasize a holistic approach that considers the interplay between nature and other therapeutic factors. By integrating ecotherapy with other evidence-based practices, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy or mindfulness-based interventions, practitioners can create a more comprehensive framework for promoting mental health.

Addressing the Challenges

To effectively address the challenges and critiques of ecotherapy, several strategies can be implemented:

1. Enhancing Accessibility

Improving access to natural spaces is essential for making ecotherapy more inclusive. This can involve advocating for the development of green spaces in urban areas, creating partnerships with community organizations to facilitate outdoor activities, and promoting programs that bring nature to underserved populations. Ensuring that ecotherapy is accessible to diverse communities can enhance its impact and reach.

2. Fostering Empirical Research

Investing in rigorous research is vital for establishing the credibility of ecotherapy within the mental health community. By conducting studies that utilize robust methodologies, researchers can provide compelling evidence of ecotherapy’s effectiveness and elucidate the mechanisms through which nature promotes healing. Such research can contribute to the development of best practices and guidelines for integrating ecotherapy into therapeutic settings.

3. Emphasizing Personalization

Recognizing the variability in individual responses to ecotherapy is essential for its successful implementation. Practitioners should adopt a personalized approach that considers the unique backgrounds, preferences, and experiences of each participant. By tailoring interventions to meet individual needs, practitioners can enhance the effectiveness of ecotherapy and promote positive outcomes.

In conclusion, while ecotherapy presents numerous benefits for mental health and well-being, it also faces significant challenges and critiques. By addressing issues related to accessibility, empirical support, and the complexity of healing, the field of ecotherapy can continue to evolve and refine its practices. Through a commitment to inclusivity, research, and personalization, ecotherapy has the potential to become a transformative force in mental health treatment.

Conclusion

In summary, ecotherapy represents a promising approach to mental health treatment that harnesses the healing potential of nature. By integrating various nature-based practices, including wilderness therapy, horticultural therapy, and community-based initiatives, ecotherapy addresses psychological, physiological, and spiritual dimensions of healing. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of these interventions in reducing stress, anxiety, and depression while promoting emotional well-being and personal growth (Bratman et al., 2019; Hartig et al., 2014). As mental health professionals increasingly recognize the importance of nature in therapeutic contexts, ecotherapy offers a valuable framework for fostering holistic healing.

Despite its benefits, ecotherapy also faces significant challenges, including issues related to accessibility, variability in individual responses, and the need for empirical validation. The disparities in access to natural spaces, particularly for marginalized communities, highlight the importance of developing inclusive practices that allow all individuals to benefit from nature’s restorative effects (Cree, 2016). Additionally, addressing the critiques surrounding the empirical support for ecotherapy is essential for establishing its credibility within the mental health field. Rigorous research is needed to substantiate the claims surrounding ecotherapy and clarify the mechanisms through which nature facilitates healing (Jain et al., 2020).

Looking ahead, the future of ecotherapy lies in its ability to adapt and evolve in response to these challenges. By fostering collaborations among mental health practitioners, researchers, and community organizations, the field can work toward increasing accessibility, enhancing the personalization of interventions, and promoting evidence-based practices. Ultimately, as ecotherapy continues to integrate into therapeutic settings, it has the potential to transform not only individual lives but also communities by promoting a deeper connection with nature and fostering a sense of shared responsibility for environmental stewardship (Wilber, 2000). Embracing this holistic approach to healing can contribute significantly to the overall well-being of individuals and society as a whole.

Bibliography

1. Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
2. Bratman, G. N., Anderson, C. B., Beverly, E. K., & Grosch, J. W. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5(7), eaax3028. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax3028
3. Cree, K. (2016). Urban nature and health: An exploratory study of the role of urban nature in promoting health and well-being. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.009
4. Deloria, V. (2003). Spirit and reason: The Vine Deloria, Jr. reader. Fulcrum Publishing.
5. Gass, M. A. (1993). Adventure therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure experiences. Haworth Press.
6. Gonzalez, M. T., Hine, R. E., & Zubala, A. (2011). The benefits of gardening for health and well-being: A review of the evidence. Health & Place, 17(3), 579-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.007
7. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
8. Hays, K. L., & O’Connor, P. J. (2017). Nature as a context for mindfulness: A review of the research. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 57(3), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167816646287
9. Jain, A., Antle, A., & Bhatia, S. (2020). Anxiety and nature: The role of nature in the context of anxiety. Environmental Psychology, 70, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101414
10. Jordan, M., Hinds, J., & Tarrant, M. (2010). Ecotherapy: An overview of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(3), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.002
11. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delacorte Press.
12. Kaplan, R. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
13. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
14. Korpela, K. M., Boric, E., & Hartig, T. (2016). Nature and health: The role of the natural environment in promoting health. Health & Place, 42, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.008
15. Li, Q., Nakamura, H., & Kaplan, R. (2016). The impact of forest bathing on health outcomes: A systematic review. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 21(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-016-0036-8
16. Martin, L. L., Biddle, S. J. H., & Boulton, E. (2018). Mindfulness and the role of nature: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 9(2), 425-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0807-0
17. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. D. Van Nostrand Company.
18. Nanda, U., Neff, K. D., & Cazares, F. (2018). The effects of equine-assisted therapy on emotional and social outcomes in adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(5), 1439-1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1011-8
19. Odendaal, J. S. J., & Meintjes, R. A. (2003). Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behavior between humans and dogs. Veterinary Journal, 165(3), 296-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-0233(02)00169-9
20. Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., & Kagawa, T. (2010). Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 2004-2006. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-009-0134-6
21. Pavlovich, K., McBain, J., & Brown, R. (2017). Understanding the collective consciousness of communities: A transpersonal perspective. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 49(2), 100-113.
22. Roszak, T. (1992). The voice of the earth: An exploration of eco-psychology. Simon & Schuster.
23. Russell, K. C. (2001). Wilderness therapy: A literature review. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(3), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590102400302
24. Sempik, J., Bragg, R., & Wood, C. (2010). Social and therapeutic horticulture: Evidence and resources for practice. Routledge.
25. Ulrich, R. S. (1991). Effects of view on recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6146400
26. Ulrich, R. S. (1999). Effects of gardens on health outcomes: A review of the evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46(1-3), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00021-5
27. Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Shambhala Publications.
28. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard University Press.